2025-12-30 12:12:57

How did Kaito Launchpad perform in 2025? Data shows that a total of 14 new projects were launched last year. Among them, 3 projects have not yet undergone TGE, namely Espresso, Billions, and Rise.

Looking at the performance, it's a bit disappointing. So far, only LMTS, ZKP, and CHECK have prices still above their ICO prices. LMTS performed the best among them, while PLAI had the worst performance on the first day, and overall, XNL performed the weakest.

This set of data reflects a quite obvious differentiation phenomenon among Launchpad projects last year. Very few projects maintained prices above ICO levels, with most facing a breakdown in value. For users interested in new projects, this is also a reminder — the risk factor of Launchpad projects remains high, and choosing the right projects and timing is crucial.

LMTS-1,35%

ZKP8,86%

XNL-17,6%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MissedAirdropBro

· 9h ago

It's another major dip event, LMTS really held the scene... forget about the others.

View OriginalReply0

BtcDailyResearcher

· 17h ago

Only 3 out of 14 projects have stabilized, this break-even rate is really quite brutal. PLAI crashed on its first day, lessons must be learned. Wait, what about those 3 projects that haven't had TGE yet? Their future seems to be the real key. How do the veterans choose? Can they really make a profit? LMTS has held up pretty well, but overall, it's truly a game of life and death. Break-even becoming the norm, this is the real picture of current launchpads. 14 projects a year, and only a few survive in the end. These numbers need to wake us up.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9ad11037

· 17h ago

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't break the IPO price... This success rate is really disappointing; it still depends on luck and timing.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 17h ago

Only 3 out of 14 projects are still standing; this collapse rate is truly astonishing.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 17h ago

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't break the launch price; this data is pretty brutal... Launchpad is still a gamble Honestly, relying on luck rather than skill is best avoided LMTS is indeed impressive this time, but as for the others... sigh Another bloody lesson; choosing the wrong project really turns into a slaughterhouse Rather than trusting Launchpad, it's better to do your own research and pick projects With such a high break rate, who still dares to go all in Brothers, don't be fooled by hype; the risks are written all over it

View OriginalReply0

UncleWhale

· 17h ago

Out of 14 projects, only 3 haven't experienced a breakdown, and we have to wait for three TGEs to know... The success rate is truly incredible. With such aggressive breakdowns, the LMTS team really made a profit, while the others are all lessons learned. PLAI performed poorly on its first day; I don't touch such projects. If the timing is just a little off, it's all over. I predicted that XNL would be the weakest; choosing projects really depends on luck. By the way, can these three projects that haven't had their TGE save the day, or will it continue to be stories of bagholders?

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 17h ago

ngl the 21% survival rate screaming inefficiency vectors here... most launchpads are just liquidity traps masquerading as alpha opportunities honestly

Reply0

ColdWalletGuardian

· 17h ago

Only 3 out of 14 projects didn't experience a dip below the launch price. That's crazy. It's better to stay away from launchpads.

View OriginalReply0