Recently, I came across on-chain data again, and this "storyline" made me a bit annoyed.
My friend in Macau was supposedly scammed out of 1.18 million through a "financial management channel." It sounds like a clever scam, but in reality—I've seen hundreds of such schemes on the chain every year. It's not about something new, but the market psychology behind it can be understood immediately through data.
**On-chain data always outpaces news**
The kind of "high returns, margin trading, quick withdrawals" schemes tend to appear most during market euphoria—specifically during FOMO phases. Looking at recent conditions, the on-chain issuance of USDT has indeed slowed down, but the balances on exchanges are piling up. What does this indicate? Retail investors are attracted by various "stories" and are entering the market, while savvy traders might be waiting for a better bottoming opportunity.
**Three signals indicating something's off**
Bitcoin has had three consecutive days of net outflows from exchanges, and large whale addresses haven't shown much activity—traditionally a bullish sign. But what’s the result? Ethereum's Gas fees suddenly surged; checking the cause reveals it's mainly some low-tier projects desperately pumping their prices. This is a classic "leek collection point" signal.
Furthermore, the Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR) is now very low, indicating that market funds are actually hesitating, which is completely opposite to the characteristics of a genuine bull market.
Any sudden price jump is essentially existing money passing around—very straightforward: fishing. It attracts those who are dazzled by "book profits of 7.9 million." Honestly, I repeatedly emphasized in the second half of the year: avoid any "internal channels" promising capital preservation or excess returns. On-chain data now fully confirms this— the higher retail enthusiasm, the greater the risk of a pullback.
**What needs to be done is actually very simple**
Instead of listening to gossip, look at the data yourself. Check the Bitcoin MVRV ratio, then look at the exchange withdrawal data—these are more honest than any analysis. Historically, veterans get caught chasing highs, newcomers get caught bottom-fishing. My advice at this point is: better to earn a little less than to become the "bagholder" in others' words.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GameFiCritic
· 15h ago
It's the same old trick of "capital preservation with high returns." On-chain data has long exposed the underlying logic, but retail investors just can't see through it.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 22h ago
Actually, if you run a basic correlation matrix on SSR vs retail inflows, the data tells a completely different story than what most people are parsing here.
Reply0
FloorSweeper
· 22h ago
lol, every cycle same playbook, different victims. this澳门 guy just learned what we've been watching on-chain for years now
Reply0
FantasyGuardian
· 22h ago
1.18 million... Here we go again with the old tricks. Whenever you hear the words "channel" and "quick withdrawal," you should tighten up.
Honestly, on-chain data is more ruthless than news reports; that stuff can't lie.
Right now, this situation is indeed strange—exchanges are piling up, whales are inactive, and retail investors are desperately buying... a typical time for leek harvesting.
Better to miss out than become the bagholder—that's no lie.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 22h ago
1. Losing 1.18 million is all your own greed. The on-chain data is right there, but you insist on hearing stories.
2. Gas fees exploding and the poodle pushing the price up—that's a typical scene of leek harvesting.
3. Wait, the whale address has no movement—that's suspicious.
4. It's that same "principal protection and high returns" scam again, happening every year. Some people still believe it.
5. Instead of analyzing for a long time, just look at the MVRV ratio. Data can't lie.
6. The exchange is holding so much USDT, which means they are all waiting to harvest the leeks.
7. I'd rather earn less than be the bag holder. I agree with that.
8. The crazier retail investors are, the greater the risk. That logic makes sense.
9. Losing 1.18 million in one stroke—serves you right. Did you dare to move without checking the on-chain data?
10. Short-term surge is just existing funds fighting each other. Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 22h ago
1.18 million for a single sword, how much can you bluff... Speaking of which, every day I look at the on-chain data, these kinds of tricks have been common for a long time.
---
Really, don't listen to any high-yield channels. Just look at USDT issuance and exchange balances to understand everything. Retail investors are entering, and veterans are waiting to buy the dip.
---
The sudden spike in gas fees is all caused by shill accounts... This signal is so clear that I don't even need to analyze; I already know what actions will follow.
---
To put it simply, short-term rapid increases are just existing funds flipping back and forth. The real money is still on the sidelines. I really don't recommend jumping into those capital-preserving channels now.
---
Instead of guessing blindly, it's better to check MVRV and withdrawal data yourself. It's very honest... veterans chase high and die, beginners buy the dip and also die. Keep this position well and don't become a bagholder.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 22h ago
Luban is working on the chain again, this time looking for bugs in the USDT pile. In theory, what should this data indicate... I'll try this SSR trap first.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 22h ago
How many days have passed since the last time we mentioned "stability"? According to the database, the hype cycle for this kind of "high-yield channel" is approximately 1,180,000 divided by retail investors' rationality value... It will eventually be realized, aha.
Recently, I came across on-chain data again, and this "storyline" made me a bit annoyed.
My friend in Macau was supposedly scammed out of 1.18 million through a "financial management channel." It sounds like a clever scam, but in reality—I've seen hundreds of such schemes on the chain every year. It's not about something new, but the market psychology behind it can be understood immediately through data.
**On-chain data always outpaces news**
The kind of "high returns, margin trading, quick withdrawals" schemes tend to appear most during market euphoria—specifically during FOMO phases. Looking at recent conditions, the on-chain issuance of USDT has indeed slowed down, but the balances on exchanges are piling up. What does this indicate? Retail investors are attracted by various "stories" and are entering the market, while savvy traders might be waiting for a better bottoming opportunity.
**Three signals indicating something's off**
Bitcoin has had three consecutive days of net outflows from exchanges, and large whale addresses haven't shown much activity—traditionally a bullish sign. But what’s the result? Ethereum's Gas fees suddenly surged; checking the cause reveals it's mainly some low-tier projects desperately pumping their prices. This is a classic "leek collection point" signal.
Furthermore, the Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR) is now very low, indicating that market funds are actually hesitating, which is completely opposite to the characteristics of a genuine bull market.
**Short-term surge = existing funds "creating liquidity"**
Any sudden price jump is essentially existing money passing around—very straightforward: fishing. It attracts those who are dazzled by "book profits of 7.9 million." Honestly, I repeatedly emphasized in the second half of the year: avoid any "internal channels" promising capital preservation or excess returns. On-chain data now fully confirms this— the higher retail enthusiasm, the greater the risk of a pullback.
**What needs to be done is actually very simple**
Instead of listening to gossip, look at the data yourself. Check the Bitcoin MVRV ratio, then look at the exchange withdrawal data—these are more honest than any analysis. Historically, veterans get caught chasing highs, newcomers get caught bottom-fishing. My advice at this point is: better to earn a little less than to become the "bagholder" in others' words.