Over the past few years of trading, I’ve always carefully cross-referenced on-chain data whenever I see key information. Recently, I came across a piece of news, combined with several data indicators I’ve been tracking, and I think it’s worth a serious discussion—this might really be a turning point.
The core of the news is this: leading institutions like Kraken, Consensys, and BitGo are planning to go public around 2026, covering key areas such as trading, wallets, and custody. Some market analyses point out that the valuation logic in the secondary market is changing—pure concept hype is becoming less effective at boosting valuations. In the future, compliance progress, actual revenue, and risk management levels will matter more. In other words, the crypto industry is shifting from wild expansion to a stage where fundamentals matter more, with leading players gaining ground and smaller ones being pushed to the margins.
Why do I see it this way? News alone isn’t enough; on-chain data provides the real picture. Recently, large Bitcoin transfers have become particularly frequent, with single transactions over 1000 BTC increasing. The activity of these whale addresses has noticeably picked up. What does this usually indicate? Institutions and big funds are quietly positioning themselves, possibly warming up for major moves ahead. Ethereum is also quite interesting—active addresses are steadily increasing, but network gas fees haven’t skyrocketed, indicating real demand supporting the network rather than false prosperity driven by hype. All these data points point in the same direction: money is shifting from story-driven speculation to backing real projects.
Based on this judgment, here’s how I see the upcoming market trend:
In the short term, news about IPO expectations will create some volatility and trading opportunities—that’s obvious. But in the long run, when several waves of listings arrive around 2026, the landscape will be thoroughly divided. Only those with solid compliance, real revenue, and mature risk control systems will sustain growth—mainly leading trading platforms and infrastructure projects. Smaller coins lacking strong competitive advantages will become increasingly marginalized unless they have genuine technological innovation.
My investment strategy advice is straightforward: stop blindly FOMOing. Focus on leading sectors with IPO potential, while also paying attention to the linkage opportunities across US stocks, Hong Kong stocks, and other markets. The allocation approach should prioritize stability, with a focus on projects whose fundamentals are clear and growth logic is understandable.
Ultimately, the game rules of the market are being rewritten. Projects still relying on storytelling to attract retail investors will find it increasingly difficult. Our strategy must also adapt—keep a close eye on top players and stay steady. If we grasp this rhythm, time will naturally give us feedback. I’ll continue sharing more insights as I observe additional data.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinGuardian
· 6h ago
Whales are indeed moving, this wave is truly different
---
The era of blind FOMO is over, now it's all about who grabs the right advantage
---
On-chain data speaks for itself, stories are no longer valuable
---
With the 2026 listing wave coming, how will small coins survive?
---
Compliance, revenue, risk control—these are the new evaluation systems
---
Based on your logic, I believe it, but I'm a bit worried that too many people are bottom-fishing
---
Leading projects eat the big pieces, small players sip the soup—does the landscape really change this quickly?
---
How long can IPO expectations last? It depends on whether fundamentals can keep up
---
Gas fees haven't skyrocketed, but the number of addresses is increasing—this signal is indeed clear
---
Others are greedy while I am cautious; when others are cautious, I dare to be greedy
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 20h ago
Whales are moving BTC again, this time not to dump.
On-chain data doesn't lie, they are really starting to position themselves.
The 2026 listing wave is coming, will small coins become obsolete? That seems too absolute.
I actually think this round depends on who can survive until then.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLord
· 20h ago
Whales are moving, we need to follow the move
This wave of IPOs is really here, on-chain data doesn't lie
Compliance revenue is the new order, projects that tell stories should really be afraid
Short-term fluctuations are opportunities, but in the long run, focus on the leaders
Small coins will eventually be out, there's nothing to worry about
Only projects with clear fundamentals are worth holding, stop FOMOing recklessly
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 20h ago
This logic makes sense, but I care more about when the fluctuations in whale addresses will actually land in the secondary market.
After the IPO wave, do retail investors still have a chance, or should they just lie flat and wait for dividends?
It's easy to say that the leading players are eating the meat, but the key is who really counts as the leader now.
Regarding compliance issues, will there be surprises on the Hong Kong stock market? Are there any worth bottom-fishing?
Projects that tell stories won't die easily; it's time for a reshuffle.
2026 still feels far away. How to stay calm and avoid FOMO during this period?
We should learn from this on-chain data analysis method and try to verify it ourselves.
But projects with good fundamentals are already being overvalued; is there still a chance for low-entry points?
It sounds familiar, like last year's analysis. Hopefully, this time it can truly come true.
Is active whale activity necessarily a good sign? Have you considered the opposite?
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmi
· 20h ago
Awake, this wave is really different. The leading players are indeed quietly making their moves.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 20h ago
Whales are really quietly entering the market; on-chain data can't deceive people.
Be cautious of the 2026 listing wave; only the leading projects are worth copying.
The storytelling coins should give up; the era of fundamentals has arrived.
Institutions are deploying, retail investors are still FOMOing; the gap is becoming more and more obvious.
Compliance + revenue + risk control, that's what really matters; everything else is nonsense.
Gas fees haven't skyrocketed, but active addresses are increasing, indicating genuine demand supporting it, not false prosperity.
Don't blindly FOMO, brother; look at the fundamentals clearly before taking action, time will give feedback.
This wave of market has a very sharp polarization; top projects are eating the meat, small coins are drinking the soup; choosing the wrong one wastes time.
From chasing stories to investing in real projects, the market rules are indeed being rewritten; we need to keep up with the rhythm.
Over the past few years of trading, I’ve always carefully cross-referenced on-chain data whenever I see key information. Recently, I came across a piece of news, combined with several data indicators I’ve been tracking, and I think it’s worth a serious discussion—this might really be a turning point.
The core of the news is this: leading institutions like Kraken, Consensys, and BitGo are planning to go public around 2026, covering key areas such as trading, wallets, and custody. Some market analyses point out that the valuation logic in the secondary market is changing—pure concept hype is becoming less effective at boosting valuations. In the future, compliance progress, actual revenue, and risk management levels will matter more. In other words, the crypto industry is shifting from wild expansion to a stage where fundamentals matter more, with leading players gaining ground and smaller ones being pushed to the margins.
Why do I see it this way? News alone isn’t enough; on-chain data provides the real picture. Recently, large Bitcoin transfers have become particularly frequent, with single transactions over 1000 BTC increasing. The activity of these whale addresses has noticeably picked up. What does this usually indicate? Institutions and big funds are quietly positioning themselves, possibly warming up for major moves ahead. Ethereum is also quite interesting—active addresses are steadily increasing, but network gas fees haven’t skyrocketed, indicating real demand supporting the network rather than false prosperity driven by hype. All these data points point in the same direction: money is shifting from story-driven speculation to backing real projects.
Based on this judgment, here’s how I see the upcoming market trend:
In the short term, news about IPO expectations will create some volatility and trading opportunities—that’s obvious. But in the long run, when several waves of listings arrive around 2026, the landscape will be thoroughly divided. Only those with solid compliance, real revenue, and mature risk control systems will sustain growth—mainly leading trading platforms and infrastructure projects. Smaller coins lacking strong competitive advantages will become increasingly marginalized unless they have genuine technological innovation.
My investment strategy advice is straightforward: stop blindly FOMOing. Focus on leading sectors with IPO potential, while also paying attention to the linkage opportunities across US stocks, Hong Kong stocks, and other markets. The allocation approach should prioritize stability, with a focus on projects whose fundamentals are clear and growth logic is understandable.
Ultimately, the game rules of the market are being rewritten. Projects still relying on storytelling to attract retail investors will find it increasingly difficult. Our strategy must also adapt—keep a close eye on top players and stay steady. If we grasp this rhythm, time will naturally give us feedback. I’ll continue sharing more insights as I observe additional data.