2025-12-30 11:22:26

This year, data from a leading on-chain research institution still speaks volumes—686 in-depth reports published throughout the year, accumulating 8.4 million views.

From capturing early Alpha opportunities to dissecting the true holding logic of KOLs; from on-chain reviews of policy-related tokens like $TRUMP to continuous tracking of the $BTC macro cycle, this research framework has become a reference for many traders.

Interestingly, by combining on-chain data with market narratives, it is indeed possible to identify some turning points earlier. The analytical dimensions of those hot events in the annual review—whether it’s changes in trading data or whale holding movements—demonstrate the depth of research by professional institutions. For those wanting to gain a deeper understanding of market dynamics, this kind of systematic analysis is definitely worth referencing.

TRUMP0,42%

BTC1,5%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BitcoinDaddy

· 5h ago

8.4 million views is really impressive, but how many actually make money?

View OriginalReply0

PancakeFlippa

· 13h ago

84 million views, this number is indeed impressive, but truly profitable ones still depend on your own judgment. --- On-chain data is useful, but I'm worried that too many follow the trend, which could turn into a contrarian indicator. --- I've always felt that the breakdown of KOL holdings is quite exaggerated; frankly, they are just gambling. --- I trust the macro cycle tracking of $BTC, but analyzing policy-driven currencies is indeed easy to fall into traps. --- 686 in-depth analyses are quite a lot, but the key question is how many people truly understand them. --- Whale movements can indeed provide hints, provided you react quickly enough. --- Discovering a turning point early doesn't mean you can copy it all the way; that's the real test. --- Systematic analysis sounds comfortable, but when it comes to execution, it still depends on courage and luck.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanKing

· 13h ago

Speaking of which, on-chain data is indeed reliable, but it depends on who is using it... Some people can still be easily exploited despite these analyses.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoMotivator

· 14h ago

8.4 million views look great, but the real question is: how many analyses can actually make money?

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 14h ago

8.4 million views? Come on, the ones who are really making money have already gone underground, and they still follow trends by looking at reports like this.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 14h ago

686 articles with 8.4 million views... This data indeed shows the market's strong desire for on-chain research, but the key question is—does the incentive mechanism of this framework truly align incentives? The data looks good, but what about the percentage of traders who actually make a profit? That is the real metric to evaluate the research's value. Historically, many "professional institutions" have experienced failures simply because they packaged complexity into certainty. That said, being able to weave whale movements and market narratives into a systematic framework demonstrates solid governance logic. Worth digging deeper.

View OriginalReply0