The competition in the second and third tiers of the leverage trading track is heating up. Recently, a practical comparison was made among three platforms: Lighter, Hyperliquid, and Aster. First, regarding individual trading costs: some portfolios have earned partial gains, but others are facing losses—this highlights the necessity of selecting the right platform. In terms of fundamental analysis, Surf AI's data dimensions are relatively comprehensive, but for in-depth comparison, key indicators of these three platforms need to be supplemented. Based on current market performance, Hyperliquid's position as a leader remains relatively stable, while Lighter and Aster each have their own development paths. The differentiated competition among the second and third tiers has already begun, and investors need to choose suitable trading counterparts based on their risk preferences and trading styles. Details such as platform fee structures, risk management mechanisms, and liquidity depth often determine long-term returns.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSherlockGirlvip
· 14h ago
Well... to put it simply, it's still a multiple-choice question. How long will the situation where Hyperliquid eats the meat, Lighter, and Aster drinks the soup last? Based on my analysis, it depends on who can master the two key factors: fee rates and liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 14h ago
ngl the math on these fee structures never actually works out when you backtest them properly... hyperliquid's "advantage" keeps looking smaller the deeper you dig into the tokenomics
Reply0
StillBuyingTheDipvip
· 14h ago
HL's current fee structure has really changed, so you need to choose carefully. Which one performs better, Lighter or Aster?
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 14h ago
Hey, Hyperliquid is getting a bit tired of eating alone. Currently, Lighter and Aster are indeed working on differentiation, but to be honest, the liquidity aspect still leaves something to be desired.
View OriginalReply0
MevWhisperervip
· 14h ago
Hey, Hyperliquid still has that flavor, but the fee structure of Lighter has been pretty interesting lately.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatientvip
· 14h ago
Speaking of Hyperliquid, it still has some potential, but I need to take another look at the fee structure on Lighter... Really, choosing the wrong platform makes a huge difference in returns. How about Aster? Has anyone actually used it? It doesn't seem to be as popular. Fee structures are the most brutal; small differences in details can eat away at long-term gains. The second and third tiers are quite interesting to watch, but for small retail investors like us, careful calculation is still necessary.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 14h ago
ngl hyperliquid's moat is basically just network effects at this point... statistically speaking, lighter and aster need like 40% better execution to even compete lol
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)