Recently, after discussions with several veteran contract traders, everyone shares the same feeling: this year's market movements are becoming increasingly difficult to analyze using technical analysis alone. Behind the rapid surges and crashes, it’s often a matter of reacting one step too late. The real issue isn’t the tools, but that the underlying market logic has completely changed.



**The Great Shift in Market Drivers**

In the past, the bull market was dominated by retail FOMO. When emotions ran high, the market would go wild. Now, it’s different. We have entered an era of "institutionalization," where two forces are truly steering the ship:

On one side, institutional funds—such as the hundreds of billions flowing into spot Bitcoin ETFs—determine the market’s liquidity abundance or scarcity. These inflows and outflows are highly disciplined and don’t play emotional games. On the other side are government-level policy directives. Cryptocurrency has long become a pawn in global political and economic games. Any political shifts, regulatory changes, or election cycles in major countries can cause market volatility far exceeding previous "halving" expectations.

For those trading contracts, this means that the risk of simply betting on the direction is being amplified infinitely. You must incorporate the "policy calendar" and "institutional fund flows" into your analysis framework—these have become essential indicators.

**Finding Opportunities Amidst Volatility**

High volatility is indeed a double-edged sword. How can you turn risk into opportunity? Two proven approaches are worth considering:

The first approach is to be a "smart minority." When the market plunges into extreme panic and exhibits "surrender selling" (such as fear indicators soaring and large sell-offs), it’s often the moment when institutions quietly position themselves. You need to learn how to identify genuine institutional bottoms when others are fearful, rather than blindly following the herd to buy the dip.

In simple terms, the underlying market logic has changed, and your trading framework must be upgraded accordingly. Technical analysis still matters, but it’s only surface-level. Multi-dimensional monitoring of policy, capital flows, and sentiment is key to surviving and thriving in this new era.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenDAOvip
· 8h ago
Basically, retail investors are finding it harder and harder to survive. Once institutional pricing power is established, your technical analysis becomes just a decoration.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 8h ago
Another story of "framework upgrade." In theory, it should be feasible, but I bet five bucks most people are still drawing lines... As for the policy calendar, I'll try this smart trap first; I feel like I'll just lock myself inside again. Institutional fund rhythm is indeed interesting; I'm just worried it will be mistaken for institutional layout, and in the end, it's just another wave of retail bottom-fishing. To put it plainly, it's still a game of information asymmetry—who reacts faster gets the meat. For us doing a small experiment, we're destined to be the ones drinking the soup. No matter how many frameworks there are, in the end, it still depends on who has stronger psychological resilience. Can you hold on when the fear indicator skyrockets? That's not something you can write into a textbook. Now even the "smart minority" has become a routine, and these two words really have MAX academic value and MIN practical value... There are institutional players, and we have bricks... Luban No.7 is under construction again. So now, are we proficient in volatility? I’d rather believe in ghosts. Policy fluctuations decide life and death; it feels like we're not just trading but gambling. Choosing the right country and the right timing is the real trump card. Thinking about technical analysis as just surface-level is really painful. How many people have been eating from candlestick charts for ten years, and now they tell us to look at policies? Multi-dimensional monitoring sounds great, but in reality, it's just an upgraded version of information anxiety.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 8h ago
Drawing lines? Wake up, institutions are all playing the macro game now. Relying on individual technical analysis is long outdated, isn't it? The policy calendar is the real game-changer; I have deep experience with this. While institutions are making strategic moves, retail investors are still panicking and cutting losses—that's a huge difference. In plain terms, you need to learn to spot hidden signals and not just look at the K-line.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 8h ago
Honestly, the era of drawing lines has long passed. Now, if you're still trading based on candlestick charts, you really need to wake up. When institutional funds come in, retail investors' technical analysis becomes a joke. The key is to watch the policy and ETF rhythm. Is panic selling actually an opportunity? Sounds good, but I still trust my own instincts more than the stories of the "smart minority." The regulatory policy calendar definitely needs to be monitored, but frankly, it still requires large funds to support it. Otherwise, understanding it is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)