The recent rally in the computing power chip sector has been quite fierce, with the CPO index soaring to the top of the gainers list, driving high-speed copper cable connections to follow suit. However, there's an interesting point here: the 60-minute MACD has already formed a death cross at high levels, and on the intraday chart, the new highs are showing a clear divergence. Nevertheless, the 60-minute four-season cycle indicator remains strong and is still trending upward. The conflicting signals suggest that the short-term battle is not over yet. To put it simply, whether to take profits here depends on whether you can withstand the high-level oscillations and turbulence.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NewDAOdreamer
· 8h ago
This wave of CPO is indeed fierce, but I started to panic when the MACD formed a death cross. Divergence appearing is never a good sign.
---
When indicators are conflicting, it’s the most uncomfortable, feeling like awaiting a verdict. Who can withstand the high-level oscillations and make money.
---
Honestly, in this kind of situation, I usually reduce my positions first, and treat the rest as a game.
---
The four-season cycle is still at its peak, but the MACD has formed a death cross? Isn’t this a prelude to a trend reversal? Better to be cautious.
---
As for taking profits, looking at the market, it feels a bit off. Better to earn less than get caught in a trap.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 8h ago
Oh wow, that move was really aggressive, but even with the MACD showing a death cross, you still dare to chase? I'm truly scared now.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 8h ago
A bearish crossover combined with divergence—this rhythm is a bit risky. I think I'll lock in my profits first.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 8h ago
I've seen many instances of indicator conflicts, and historically, every time it's the most testing period for mechanism design. When MACD forms a death cross combined with divergence, it sounds like two factions each have valid points during some DAO proposal votes. The key still depends on how long the consensus can hold.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 8h ago
The death cross divergence has already appeared, and you're still daring to push upward? Who can hold on will determine this wave. Anyway, I have already cut my position in half.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 8h ago
The high-level death cross is still rising, this is ridiculous. I'd better lock in my profits first.
The recent rally in the computing power chip sector has been quite fierce, with the CPO index soaring to the top of the gainers list, driving high-speed copper cable connections to follow suit. However, there's an interesting point here: the 60-minute MACD has already formed a death cross at high levels, and on the intraday chart, the new highs are showing a clear divergence. Nevertheless, the 60-minute four-season cycle indicator remains strong and is still trending upward. The conflicting signals suggest that the short-term battle is not over yet. To put it simply, whether to take profits here depends on whether you can withstand the high-level oscillations and turbulence.