Recently, an analyst threw out a bold opinion: don’t be fooled by Bitcoin currently hovering around $88,000; by 2026, it might head straight to $50,000, and even potentially touch $10,000. At first glance, it sounds shocking, but the logic behind it is actually quite interesting.
What is the core judgment of this analyst? He believes that 2025 could be the peak price for Bitcoin and the entire cryptocurrency market. Look at the current situation: from the all-time high of $126,000 set last October to now, Bitcoin has already retraced by a full 30%. That’s the magnitude of this correction.
But what’s even more interesting is that he raised a question about market structure. Gold remains stable because its competitors are limited—mainly silver, platinum, and palladium. But Bitcoin? As the first cryptocurrency, it was once dazzling, but now it faces competition from millions of digital assets. This shift in the competitive landscape is indeed a serious issue for Bitcoin’s market positioning and price expectations.
What do you think? Whether this logic holds up depends on your own judgment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenMcsleepless
· 4h ago
The analogy of gold is indeed fresh, but it overlooks one point—Bitcoin's competitiveness has never come from scarcity itself.
---
50,000? 10,000? That's nonsense. It was about time to bet against futures.
---
Millions of coins? What’s next, buying the worst ones? That logic is a bit dismissive.
---
I believe 2025 will hit a top, but dropping so hard? Maybe it's just another wave of capital absorption.
---
The analogy of gold with just a few competitors is too simplistic; they are completely different matters.
---
It's the same old "sleepwalking" rhetoric at the beginning of the year. Wake up, everyone.
---
Something's off. A 30% retracement—what's that about? Is it the mechanism, or does it really need to fall?
---
If more competition means more crashes, then the internet should be dead by now. That's nonsense.
---
I actually think that with all the chaos in the crypto world, Bitcoin is increasingly becoming a safe-haven asset.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 16h ago
The gold benchmarking argument sounds impressive, but when it comes to competing with millions of cryptocurrencies... how many truly survive?
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSell
· 16h ago
The golden ratio analogy really hits the point, but among millions of cryptocurrencies, 99% are just air, and there are only a few truly competitive ones.
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalist
· 16h ago
Millions of coins competing together, Bitcoin might not necessarily win after all.
Recently, an analyst threw out a bold opinion: don’t be fooled by Bitcoin currently hovering around $88,000; by 2026, it might head straight to $50,000, and even potentially touch $10,000. At first glance, it sounds shocking, but the logic behind it is actually quite interesting.
What is the core judgment of this analyst? He believes that 2025 could be the peak price for Bitcoin and the entire cryptocurrency market. Look at the current situation: from the all-time high of $126,000 set last October to now, Bitcoin has already retraced by a full 30%. That’s the magnitude of this correction.
But what’s even more interesting is that he raised a question about market structure. Gold remains stable because its competitors are limited—mainly silver, platinum, and palladium. But Bitcoin? As the first cryptocurrency, it was once dazzling, but now it faces competition from millions of digital assets. This shift in the competitive landscape is indeed a serious issue for Bitcoin’s market positioning and price expectations.
What do you think? Whether this logic holds up depends on your own judgment.