2025-12-29 11:25:44

Developed a political donation data tracking tool that supports multi-dimensional filtering—flexible queries based on recipient, amount, donor, and other criteria. Currently, Minnesota data has been imported, and historical data from other states is being gradually integrated. Plans include adding a visualization layer to display abnormal patterns in fund flow using a spider web-style relationship map. This network structure can intuitively reveal suspicious connections and irregular movements within the funding chain—similar to on-chain wallet tracking logic, but applied to the political funding domain. The more complete the data, the clearer the clues to potential fraud.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationKing

· 17h ago

Haha, this logic is the same as on-chain tracking. Political funds also need to be "on-chain"? Someone should have done this a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 17h ago

Wait, isn't this just taking the on-chain tracking approach and applying it to political funding? That's pretty extreme. --- The web graph exposes connections... That's a clever idea, but data completeness is the key. --- Minnesota is testing the waters first; the real challenge is the historical data from other states. --- Honestly, political donation transparency should have been addressed a long time ago. --- But on the other hand, once the data is complete, won't some people prefer it not to be "too complete"? --- Using on-chain wallet tracking logic here... there's a risk of being shut down due to political pressure. --- Once all state data is integrated, this tool will be incredibly powerful. --- If the visualization is well done, ordinary people can understand the flow of funds too. Not bad.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSqueezer

· 17h ago

Ha, finally someone has brought the on-chain tracking tools into political funding. How awesome is that? --- Web of graphs? Basically, it's about laying out politicians' funding chains in the sunlight. --- Wait, isn't all this data open source? I want to dig into it myself. --- Interesting, way more exciting than watching candlestick charts. --- Minnesota is the first pilot. Did they choose the "cleanest" state to endorse? --- Thinking about those whale wallets we tracked on-chain, now the political circle deserves the same treatment😂. --- The clearer the fraud clues, the more people want to suppress them, I bet five bucks on it. --- But speaking of data sources, are they reliable? Official data itself might have some watermarks. --- This idea is brilliant. Visualization is the key—complex data visualized in one chart beats a thousand words. --- Once nationwide data is in, it will be the real "big scoop map" coming.

View OriginalReply0

StealthMoon

· 17h ago

This logic is brilliant. Moving on-chain analysis into the realm of politics and money—finally someone dares to touch this cake. --- Wallet tracking applied to political donations? Ha, now capitalists should be nervous. --- Spider web maps expose the funding chain... sounds great, but I'm afraid the data will be deleted as soon as it goes on-chain. --- Minnesota is the first to pilot this, it feels like paving the way for a big move. --- Transparency, the more complete it is, the clearer the clues become, but it also becomes more dangerous, you know. --- It's a bit like anti-money laundering logic, but with such a complex political circle, can data really tell the story? --- Now even Web3 auditing tools are being used in politics—crazy.

View OriginalReply0