Stagehand, when combined with Steel Browser, indeed outperforms Skyvern's implementation in terms of performance. However, I'm really curious to understand how Manus's browser use specifically works—what their technical approach is and how it compares to the two existing solutions above. Are there any differences in the underlying implementation logic? The speed differences behind these automated browsing tools usually involve call strategies and concurrency handling design concepts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiSherpa
· 2h ago
Stagehand + Steel Browser can indeed be effective, but I still haven't figured out the black box operations on Manus's side.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 16h ago
Stagehand working with Steel indeed hit Skyvern so hard that his parents wouldn't recognize him, but what exactly is the principle behind Manus's setup? I'm really curious.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 12-27 17:27
Stagehand is indeed impressive, but why hasn't anyone dug deeper into Manus's browser use... It feels like the real dark horse.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSniper
· 12-27 03:53
Wait, is Manus's solution really that amazing? It seems like everyone is hyping it up. I want to see actual comparison data.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 12-27 03:44
ngl the Stagehand + Steel combo looks solid on paper, but where's the actual transaction data backing this up? need to see real benchmarks not just vibes... Manus's approach probably cuts corners somewhere, they always do. concurrent handling strategy is everything here - suspicious how nobody's publishing their call stack patterns
Reply0
BankruptWorker
· 12-27 03:40
Yeah, this really depends on how Manus handles concurrency. It feels like the calling strategies are worlds apart.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 12-27 03:37
To be honest, the Stagehand setup is indeed impressive, but Manus's black-box operations are a bit hard to grasp.
Stagehand, when combined with Steel Browser, indeed outperforms Skyvern's implementation in terms of performance. However, I'm really curious to understand how Manus's browser use specifically works—what their technical approach is and how it compares to the two existing solutions above. Are there any differences in the underlying implementation logic? The speed differences behind these automated browsing tools usually involve call strategies and concurrency handling design concepts.