$PI What I am about to say may directly touch on the core controversy within the community👇

Arguing about so-called scams? Trash? Pump and dump? Do you really agree with that? Anyway, I do not agree. My views are as follows:
1. The project team has been self-sufficient and fee-free for 6 years, with no capital investment required throughout the process. They rely solely on advertising revenue to support global servers, free KYC certification, and other operational costs. There has been no fundraising or cash-out, and miners mine without the need for mining machines or electricity. Participation is voluntary throughout, so where does the “being scammed” come from?
2. The white paper clearly states that Pi is a social experiment in blockchain aimed at ordinary people. Its core is to explore inclusive finance with low barriers. It is not a guaranteed profit speculative target. Complaints mostly come from speculators who mistakenly believe in unofficial high-price consensus rumors and overestimate short-term gains. When expectations are not met, they shift blame. Essentially, this is due to their own cognitive biases and inability to distinguish true from false information, with no relation to the project team.
3. Cryptocurrency trading inherently involves volatility. Those willing to gamble should accept losing. The core of mining is to wait for mapping and observe ecological implementation. Pi’s current narrow fluctuations are the result of genuine market competition, not manipulation by the project team. Voluntary participation means accepting two possibilities of the experiment: profit or loss. Both outcomes should be accepted happily. There’s no need for emotional complaints or blame-shifting.