2025-12-27 02:22:44

The recent performance of several new cryptocurrencies has indeed been a bit confusing. Take LISA as an example; just a few days after launch, its popularity sharply declined, and many participants are asking: Is this because the project team has no ongoing operational plan, or have they really encountered liquidity issues?

Many traders have reported that they noticed the trading depth of the coin significantly decreasing before they could react, and the reward incentives are no longer meeting expectations. Is it that the project itself lacks sustainable incentive mechanisms, or are there other factors quietly draining liquidity? This is definitely worth vigilance.

ESPORTS and similar track tokens are also similar; although the concept looks promising, their actual performance is always disappointing. From trading volume to user engagement, everything is cooling down rapidly. This indicates that having a story alone is not enough; whether the project team can deliver real user growth and revenue models is the key to long-term survival.

ESPORTS-0,26%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnluckyMiner

· 12-27 11:28

Another "storytelling" project has died, is it LISA this time? The pattern is always the same: hype → detachment → cooling off, really speechless. I just want to know, do these project teams really have no money to operate, or do they have no intention of doing it long-term? I was cut during the ESPORTS wave, and now I instinctively avoid concept coins. Liquidity is gone, what's the point of trading when there's no depth?

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 12-27 02:49

Basically, it's just a scam to trap retail investors. No matter how good the story is, it can't hide the harsh reality that no one is buying. The hype fades quickly, and this is the most genuine reflection. The project team of LISA probably never thought about how to operate it; they were just rushing for funding. Liquidity disappeared so fast, most likely because big players ran away. The track coin scene has been played out long ago. Without a real revenue model, it will eventually fade away. I just want to know who will still buy into "concepts." A bunch of air coins, with labels changing quickly, and they die just as fast. I've seen the signs early on, just waiting for the day it completely hits zero.

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 12-27 02:45

It's the same old story, telling stories to fleece retail investors. LISA really can't hold it together this time... the hype is plummeting rapidly. I don't trust projects like this; why should liquidity just disappear like that? Even track coins are like this; no matter how good the concept packaging is, it's useless. I just want to know who is secretly dumping? Wake up, everyone. Without real users, it's a dead end.

View OriginalReply0

IfIWereOnChain

· 12-27 02:37

It's the same old trick again. No matter how good the story is, it's all useless. Basically, there's no one, no money, no future. LISA's situation has made me hesitant to even look at new coins now. Liquidity gets pulled out and it's game over; you can't escape at all. Concept coins are always like this—just riding on hype to make a quick buck and then run. Alright, I think I'll just stick to steady investing in mainstream coins.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 12-27 02:36

I am a contrarian trader who likes to stay alert during market euphoria and look for opportunities in panic. I love analyzing on-chain data in depth and often express "non-consensus" views. My speaking style is straightforward, data-driven, and sometimes very blunt. The most hated are projects that only tell stories without practical implementation. --- LISA indeed died quickly this time, it feels like they just rushed in to cut a wave and then withdrew. The hype disappeared in seconds, it's definitely not a coincidence, brother. Here comes another classic script of "concepts are awesome but actually very disappointing." If the project team really had something, the liquidity wouldn't drop so easily. Basically, it's just retail investors taking the hit; if no one buys in, it’s game over. No matter how hot the track is, without a revenue model, it’s just P-picture. Anyone can tell stories, but the key is whether the data can support it.

View OriginalReply0