2025-12-27 02:20:41

Honestly, the profit logic of participating in IDOs has been completely rewritten in the past two years.

Looking back at last year's experience: launching seven projects across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, and Optimism, with over 12 asset bridging operations, and a total gas fee of over $800 burned. In the end, only two projects truly stuck with me—one mainly because I knew the project team personally and obtained whitelist access through private channels, while the others were basically just along for the ride.

It wasn't until recently, after a deep dive into the contract logic of a leading platform, that I realized a problem: this entire new token issuance mechanism has already been reprogrammed. Yet, most people are still sticking to the 2021 methods, which naturally results in more and more disadvantages.

**Invisible Differentiation of Staking Weight**

The old rules were straightforward—more tokens held meant higher priority. Now, it's different. The platform has set the staked tokens into a dynamic weight system, where the weight coefficient adjusts automatically based on staking duration. The most interesting part is, after tracking data for three months, I found a pattern: within 48 hours before the launch of popular projects (especially new tokens in the AI sector), addresses that have staked for over 90 days are automatically granted a 20% increase in priority by the system.

What does this mean? It means that time itself has become the most valuable chip. The old method of temporarily boosting your quota is a joke in this algorithm—your subscription won't be rejected, but the system will default to placing you at the back of the pool.

**Cross-Chain from Manual to Automatic**

This is even more disruptive. Yesterday, I did a test: depositing 2 ETH directly into a top platform's vault on Arbitrum, without manually bridging it myself. Within a few minutes, the corresponding position was automatically configured on the Polygon side chain. The previous process, which required 12 manual operations, is now handled directly at the protocol level.

ETH0,79%

ARB1,39%

OP0,14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllTalkLongTrader

· 12-27 06:04

Is it worth burning $800 in gas fees, bro? I think that's the real point. It's about time to realize that the era of relying on the amount of held tokens is truly over. Staking duration weight? Basically, it's just forcibly locking up funds. The platform's thinking is really thorough. A 20% automatic power-up after 90 days? So, the rookie who jumps in temporarily might be instantly out of the game. I need to test the automatic cross-chain feature. It sounds convenient, but I also don't know what the routing logic is.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 12-27 02:50

Over $800 in Gas fees just to be a runner-up, this deal really isn't worth it Knowing the project team is the key to making money; frankly, it's a game of information asymmetry 90-day staking automatically increases privileges by 20%; this algorithm is really ruthless, how did I not think of it Cross-chain automation? Then all my previous manual bridges were a complete waste of time Staking duration has become a chip; now I need to change my strategy, can't just go all out anymore Temporary quota rush is long outdated; the platform's recent update directly locks out retail investors Two profitable projects are both relying on relationships; if you ask me, that says it all Will the AI track automatically increase privileges within the first 48 hours? I need to mark this down and try it next time It's 2024, and still using 2021 methods—no wonder it's not profitable

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 12-27 02:50

Burning just 800 dollars on Gas fees, this battle is really frustrating. But on the other hand, we're still sticking to the 2021 approach and stubbornly fighting, it's indeed time to wake up.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher