With holiday trading underway and liquidity thinning, markets aren’t just watching price they’re watching politics and policy. Specifically, whether Trump moves to announce his next Fed Chair nomination, with Kevin Hassett currently viewed as the leading contender. This decision may feel early, but markets don’t wait for certainty they front-run expectations.

The key issue isn’t the name itself. It’s what that choice signals about the future direction of U.S. monetary policy and how aggressively 2025 rate-cut expectations could reprice.
If the next Fed Chair is dovish, markets are likely to pull forward rate cuts and price in a deeper easing cycle. That doesn’t necessarily mean inflation disappears or that policy turns loose overnight but perception matters. A dovish Chair would suggest a higher tolerance for economic softness and a stronger willingness to support growth, employment, and financial conditions through easier policy.
In that scenario, the rate curve likely reprices quickly. Expectations for 2025 could shift from “gradual normalization” toward a more meaningful cutting cycle. The dollar would likely weaken at the margin, real yields would come down, and risk appetite would improve. Historically, that’s a constructive backdrop for assets that benefit from liquidity expansion and lower opportunity costs and Bitcoin sits high on that list.
Bitcoin doesn’t just trade on rates; it trades on expectations of future liquidity. A dovish Fed narrative reinforces the idea that fiat systems remain fragile, policy is reactive, and long-term monetary discipline is flexible at best. That environment tends to strengthen Bitcoin’s appeal both as a macro hedge and as a high-beta liquidity asset. Under a dovish repricing, BTC wouldn’t just move because rates fall it would move because confidence in tighter policy erodes.
On the other hand, if the next Chair is hawkish or closely aligned with Powell’s higher-for-longer framework, markets may need to reprice in the opposite direction. That would likely mean fewer cuts priced into 2025, a slower easing timeline, and continued emphasis on inflation control over market stability. Real yields would stay elevated, the dollar would remain supported, and risk assets would face a tougher environment.
For Bitcoin, that doesn’t mean collapse — but it likely means delay. Upside would be harder to sustain, rallies would face faster selling pressure, and BTC would remain more sensitive to liquidity shocks and leverage flushes. In a hawkish regime, Bitcoin tends to trade more like a volatility instrument than a trend asset.
My base case is that markets will react before policy changes. Even a hint that the Fed’s future leadership could lean dovish is enough to move curves, reposition capital, and reprice risk assets especially in thin holiday conditions. Bitcoin, as always, will exaggerate those moves in both directions.
My broader takeaway is this:
Bitcoin in 2025 won’t be driven by a single rate cut or a single appointment. It will be driven by confidence (or lack of it) in the credibility of monetary policy. A dovish Chair accelerates the narrative that easing is inevitable. A hawkish Chair extends uncertainty and volatility.
From a positioning standpoint, this argues for flexibility. Size matters. Timing matters. And understanding macro narratives matters more than reacting to headlines. Bitcoin thrives when liquidity expectations expand but it punishes complacency when they don’t.
Whether the next Fed Chair accelerates cuts or resists them, the repricing process itself will create opportunity. The real edge comes from recognizing that Bitcoin trades ahead of policy, not after it.
That’s the lens I’m watching this through because in markets like this, it’s not the decision that matters most, it’s how expectations shift before the decision is ever made.
‍#MacroWatchFedChairPick