Source: Yellow
Original Title: Bitcoin’s 2019-like setup points to prolonged macro headwinds, according to analyst
Original Link:
Bitcoin continues to perform persistently below traditional assets, raising doubts about whether this cycle is fundamentally different from previous bull markets.
Crypto analyst Benjamin Cowen argues that the current market setup closely resembles 2019, when Bitcoin hit a high amid apathy before real liquidity appeared.
Gold recently surpassed $4,400 per ounce, while Bitcoin trades around $87,000, approximately 30% below its all-time highs.
Major stock indices have also outperformed Bitcoin: the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq have posted double-digit gains, while BTC remains nearly flat year-to-date.
What happened
Cowen told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin responds more to actual liquidity conditions than to market optimism alone.
While stocks and gold rise on expectations of future monetary easing measures, Bitcoin needs clearer macroeconomic catalysts before surpassing other assets.
The analyst highlighted an unusually low sentiment despite relatively high prices.
Previous cycle highs were characterized by widespread retail enthusiasm and speculation. In contrast, this market has been marked by relative apathy.
Cowen addressed the debate over the four-year cycle and presented data showing that broader market cycles continue to play an important role.
He explained how macro headwinds, including labor market trends and restrictive financial conditions, could weigh on Bitcoin until 2026.
Why it matters
The comparison to 2019 suggests that Bitcoin may need a prolonged consolidation period before its next sustained rally.
In 2019, Bitcoin reached a high near $13,000 in June before entering a prolonged correction that lasted until the start of the 2020 quantitative expansion cycle.
Current conditions reflect that pattern, with quantitative tightening still in effect.
The interview emphasized the process over price predictions, focusing on how investors should think about cycles and risk management.
Cowen also discussed altcoins, suggesting that expectations of rapid rotations may be misplaced without broader liquidity expansion.
The analysis contrasts with more bullish narratives that emerged after Bitcoin ETF launches and subsequent rallies following elections.
Short-term rebounds remain possible, but sustained momentum may require real policy changes rather than just anticipated ones.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GameFiCritic
· 13h ago
Revisit the 2019 setup? To be honest, this logic doesn't quite hold up; the macro environment is completely different.
Wait, is BTC underperforming traditional assets really just a cyclical issue? It seems more like the market hasn't fully understood the new landscape yet.
This analysis... be cautious when comparing to history; every time it's said that "history repeats," the results end up proving otherwise.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 12-27 02:05
It's the same old story from 2019... Why do you keep looking back at history? When was the last time you made such a comparison?
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 12-27 01:57
Hi, that scam from 2019... I was still all-in back then. Now it looks like Bitcoin is starting to tumble again. It's really just history repeating itself, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 12-27 01:40
Revisiting the 2019 configuration? Oh, this time it feels a bit different. The macroeconomic trend is indeed a bit subdued.
Bitcoin setup similar to 2019 points to prolonged macro headwinds, according to analyst
Source: Yellow Original Title: Bitcoin’s 2019-like setup points to prolonged macro headwinds, according to analyst
Original Link: Bitcoin continues to perform persistently below traditional assets, raising doubts about whether this cycle is fundamentally different from previous bull markets.
Crypto analyst Benjamin Cowen argues that the current market setup closely resembles 2019, when Bitcoin hit a high amid apathy before real liquidity appeared.
Gold recently surpassed $4,400 per ounce, while Bitcoin trades around $87,000, approximately 30% below its all-time highs.
Major stock indices have also outperformed Bitcoin: the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq have posted double-digit gains, while BTC remains nearly flat year-to-date.
What happened
Cowen told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin responds more to actual liquidity conditions than to market optimism alone.
While stocks and gold rise on expectations of future monetary easing measures, Bitcoin needs clearer macroeconomic catalysts before surpassing other assets.
The analyst highlighted an unusually low sentiment despite relatively high prices.
Previous cycle highs were characterized by widespread retail enthusiasm and speculation. In contrast, this market has been marked by relative apathy.
Cowen addressed the debate over the four-year cycle and presented data showing that broader market cycles continue to play an important role.
He explained how macro headwinds, including labor market trends and restrictive financial conditions, could weigh on Bitcoin until 2026.
Why it matters
The comparison to 2019 suggests that Bitcoin may need a prolonged consolidation period before its next sustained rally.
In 2019, Bitcoin reached a high near $13,000 in June before entering a prolonged correction that lasted until the start of the 2020 quantitative expansion cycle.
Current conditions reflect that pattern, with quantitative tightening still in effect.
The interview emphasized the process over price predictions, focusing on how investors should think about cycles and risk management.
Cowen also discussed altcoins, suggesting that expectations of rapid rotations may be misplaced without broader liquidity expansion.
The analysis contrasts with more bullish narratives that emerged after Bitcoin ETF launches and subsequent rallies following elections.
Short-term rebounds remain possible, but sustained momentum may require real policy changes rather than just anticipated ones.