Here's the reality: manual discretionary trading still holds a structural advantage over AI-driven strategies. This gap won't close overnight. The May data proves it—and it's only become more relevant since. Why do people keep claiming AI trading dominates? Usually because they don't grasp how LLMs actually operate. Surface-level hype obscures a fundamental truth: these models have inherent constraints that discretionary traders can exploit. The edge isn't disappearing anytime soon.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 12-27 01:53
Manual trading beats AI? Nonsense, it still depends on who is faster.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollectorvip
· 12-27 01:41
Speaking of which, manual trading really isn't that easy to be replaced by AI... It seems like many people are just led astray by hype and don't really understand how LLMs work.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholarvip
· 12-27 01:37
Hmm... it still depends on human intuition. I've heard too many claims about AI trading cryptocurrencies.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)