2025-12-27 01:26:53

The actions of a certain project developer have drawn attention. Although the project team has run away, some participants had already profited in SOL, including a certain investor. From the project's structure, it appears to have design similarities with products like Liquid, Launchr, Snowball, etc., but ultimately it still faced a risky ending. This incident serves as a reminder that even if a project's initial design seems reasonable, vigilance is still needed regarding the integrity and long-term commitment of the development team. Conducting thorough due diligence and risk assessment remains crucial before participating in any emerging project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiTooHigh

· 21h ago

It's the same old trick; no matter how fancy the design, it's useless. It's about seeing through it early—cutting the last wave before running away is standard procedure. Liquid's strategy can hold up this long, but that's lucky; switch teams, and it's a rug pull. It's really about gambling mentality; due diligence sounds easy to say. Who the hell would really dig into every project from top to bottom?

View OriginalReply0

StealthDeployer

· 12-27 01:55

Another exit scam, but this time someone got in early and made a profit. Lucky them. No matter how beautiful the design is, it can't save a team without integrity. This should have been obvious from the start. Liquid, Launchr, and others are no better—they all follow the same套路. Next time, you'll have to dig into the code and check the team's background yourself. Relying solely on whitepapers is just too naive.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 12-27 01:52

Another project has run away, but at least this time some people managed to make money. It's quite ironic to see. No matter how beautiful the design is, it can't stop a team that wants to run. I've said this many times before. Sigh, those who invested early indeed made a profit, but what about the ones who took over later... That's the reality. Team integrity? It's a bit of a luxury in this circle. Instead of trusting the project, it's better to trust your own instincts. Liquid, Snowball... They sound pretty similar, and in the end, the outcomes are all the same? If you ask me, there's nothing surprising. Even thorough due diligence can't prevent malicious intent. Choice matters more than effort. It's the same old rhetoric again—full due diligence and risk assessment, hearing it until my ears are calloused... yet some still fall for it.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 12-27 01:44

It's the same old trick of running away; no matter how fancy the design, it’s all in vain. Some people make a profit with SOL, while others suffer heavy losses; this is the daily life of Web3. Every day, we emphasize due diligence, but when the opportunity is right in front of us, we still can't help... Compared to those benchmark projects, do you dare to take a closer look? They all seem to follow the same套路

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeAssassin