Honestly, no one can have all the answers. But I am willing to keep an open mind towards the most unexpected and easily mocked ideas — because that’s often where the market opportunities lie.
Take a look at the yearly chart level. Based on the TD Sequential indicator and my own HPL framework, SPX and RTY are both showing 9 countdown buy signals on the yearly chart. The week is about to close. Keep in mind, these indices have experienced a full ten years of a unidirectional decline.
Ten years. From a technical perspective, such a bottom signal combined with such a long adjustment cycle suggests considering the implications behind it. The consensus may not have fully realized it yet, but the signals are already there. Whether to believe it or how to act depends on individual risk preferences and trading discipline.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GreenCandleCollector
· 12-27 01:56
The end-of-decade signals are here, but there aren't many who truly believe.
---
TD 9 signals encountering a decade-long correction, honestly, it's a bit hard to hold.
---
The worst thing is that the consensus hasn't even reacted, and you've already been cut.
---
Having an open mindset sounds good, but the key is whether your account can withstand openness.
---
Waiting for the annual line to close—it's better to wait until it truly can't go down anymore.
---
Risk appetite is all nonsense in the face of the market.
---
Even the best signals are useless; it depends on when you dare to take action.
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 12-27 01:55
The bottom signal at the end of ten years is indeed worth paying attention to, but honestly, the consensus awakening still needs some time.
Buying based on the 9-number annual line sounds aggressive; different risk preferences can't play the same way.
No matter how low the bottom is, we need to wait for a breakdown confirmation; surface signals are far from real money.
Ten years... Is this how the long-term cycle bottom comes? I find it hard to believe.
Is TD Sequential reliable, everyone? Or is it just another signal for chopping up the chives?
Open-mindedness is fine, but bag holding is not open.
Since the consensus reacts slowly, we have to stay ahead, but do you really dare to go all-in this time?
A good signal doesn't mean a full wallet; things at the annual line level also carry annual level risks.
Deciding on the weekly close is too hasty; I'll watch the show first.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 12-27 01:55
End-of-year bottom signals? Honestly, I'm a bit hopeful, but there probably aren't many who dare to go all in.
Everyone doing technical analysis is the same; when the signals are there, they want to pull people in.
This week's closing really depends, but I've heard too many times that the consensus hasn't caught up.
If SPX really breaks down... alright, I'll just wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 12-27 01:52
End-of-2010 bottom signal, to be honest, it's a bit scary. However, in this situation, I don't dare to go all in. It still depends on how much risk I can tolerate.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 12-27 01:49
The bottom signal appeared at the end of the decade, and the consensus is still in a daze. This is the real opportunity. Looking at the combination of TD Sequential and HPL frameworks, it's quite interesting.
At this level of the yearly chart, it's hard not to listen. The problem is that most people can't see this dimension at all and are still messing around on the daily chart.
Honestly, I agree that there are often great opportunities hidden in the ideas that are ridiculed. The decade-long trend is clearly in place, and the signals are explicit. It remains to be seen who dares to act next.
As for bottom confirmation, it seems we need to wait a bit longer for a reaction. But with the framework set here, the opportunity cost might be even greater.
Signals are dead, but people are alive. Different risk preferences mean completely different operational logic, and there's no doubt about that.
The true hunter is the one who remains steadfast in their discipline when everyone else thinks it's absurd. This technical signal really leaves no reason to refuse.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12-27 01:49
The bottom signal of the decade is here, the key is whether you're willing to follow
---
TD 9 number is hyped up quite a bit, but how many can really bottom fish?
---
The consensus hasn't reacted yet, which is actually a good opportunity
---
Is it a yearly buy signal? Let me see if the risk appetite can withstand it
---
An open mindset sounds good, but actually betting real money is another matter
---
The decade adjustment with bottom signals, I need to think about this logic again
---
Not believing in TD risk discipline, this move is pretty good
---
When is the closing line? Let's wait and see this week
---
How to operate depends entirely on the individual, this is the most tricky statement
---
The signals displayed there, only a few can actually be acted upon
Honestly, no one can have all the answers. But I am willing to keep an open mind towards the most unexpected and easily mocked ideas — because that’s often where the market opportunities lie.
Take a look at the yearly chart level. Based on the TD Sequential indicator and my own HPL framework, SPX and RTY are both showing 9 countdown buy signals on the yearly chart. The week is about to close. Keep in mind, these indices have experienced a full ten years of a unidirectional decline.
Ten years. From a technical perspective, such a bottom signal combined with such a long adjustment cycle suggests considering the implications behind it. The consensus may not have fully realized it yet, but the signals are already there. Whether to believe it or how to act depends on individual risk preferences and trading discipline.