Can you imagine such a scenario? An entrepreneur sets up a lemonade stand on the roadside, but spends a fortune to hire a special forces team equipped with infrared sensors and 24-hour shift rotations to guard the cash register. It sounds absurd, but in the Web3 ecosystem of late 2025, such mismatched phenomena have become the norm. Many early-stage protocols are using the most expensive security solutions to address problems that don't require such levels of protection.



Take the oracle field as an example. Chainlink is like the "knight in armor" in the financial world—its security is almost impeccable. But the problem is, for early projects that have just secured funding and have a TVL (Total Value Locked) of less than five million dollars, this armor is heavy enough to crush their already fragile cash flow.

Why is this happening? Looking at Chainlink’s operational logic makes it clear. Its architecture is essentially an extremely costly elite review process. Every time price data is updated, multiple high-quality independent nodes must reach consensus off-chain, then push the result onto the chain. It sounds reliable, but at what cost? Each data push requires Gas fees, plus payments to the nodes.

If you are a derivatives protocol with only three-digit daily trading volume, paying several LINK tokens every few minutes just to maintain accurate price information is like using an anti-tank cannon to kill mosquitoes—technically feasible, but economically nonsensical.

From a technical design perspective, Chainlink uses a "Push Model." It’s like an expensive food delivery service that delivers on schedule—whether you’re hungry or not, the delivery person will arrive punctually at your door, and you still have to pay the delivery fee. For giants like Aave or Synthetix, whose trading volumes can support these fixed costs, using Chainlink makes sense. But for smaller protocols that don’t have enough scale? The situation is completely reversed.

This is the core contradiction in the current oracle track: the cost structure designed to ensure security ends up blocking the small projects that most need flexible pricing.
LINK2,11%
AAVE-0,46%
SNX1,9%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamervip
· 6h ago
Anti-tank guns shooting mosquitoes haha, that's a perfect analogy... The small protocol is really stuck.
View OriginalReply0
StableBoivip
· 12-27 01:54
Anti-tank guns shooting mosquitoes, really impressive. Small projects either have to grit their teeth and use them or find another way out.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 12-27 01:51
Damn, it's that same old trick from Chainlink... Small projects are just being used as cash cows.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 12-27 01:47
Haha, anti-tank guns shooting mosquitoes, it's so vivid... Using Chainlink in early projects really hurts. --- Small projects are being choked by the high costs of Chainlink, this is the current state of Web3. --- To put it simply, big fish eat small fish, and Chainlink has a monopoly on pricing power. --- Wait, what oracle solutions did those small protocols use later? Pyth? --- Bankrupting oneself for security—this deal isn't worth it. --- The problems with push models have been criticized for a long time, but Chainlink still maintains an uncontested monopoly. --- A triple-digit daily trading volume and still wanting to use institutional-grade oracles—this is asking for trouble. --- So, isn't the new track opportunity here? Who will build the pay-as-you-go oracles? --- It seems the entire Web3 is paying for "sufficient security," but are there really that many hackers targeting small projects? --- This issue is obvious in the financial industry, but does Web3 have to go through the same experience again?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWangvip
· 12-27 01:47
Oh no, isn't this the common problem in the current Web3... Small projects being drained, it's really heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
UncleLiquidationvip
· 12-27 01:38
Oh no, this is the fate of Web3—small projects get stuck at the threshold and can't move forward.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)