Making money in the crypto world boils down to mastering two dimensions.
Short-term traders rely on precise timing—the entry and exit points determine success or failure. What do long-term investors rely on? Finding like-minded partners. Many people choose the right track, but still end up losing money. The problem isn't the track itself; it's that they didn't choose the right companions.
What is the fundamental reason most crypto investors continue to incur losses? The era of going it alone is over. In the face of capital, retail investors fight separately, and the result is mutual slaughter. How many projects have you seen launch in less than a week, only for founders to run away, teams to disperse, and community confidence to collapse? That’s the cost of lacking consensus.
Conversely, those participating in liquidity mining understand that the locking period is very long. Why do they still participate? Because they understand a principle: true unity is the only way to fight against being "cut" (exploited). When interests are deeply aligned, everyone works together. Participating in mining, accumulating LP, sharing mining rewards—these mechanisms essentially connect individual gains with the community’s future.
Therefore, when choosing any project or community, ask yourself three questions: Is this team genuinely working? Does the mechanism design protect long-term participants? Is the community consensus strong enough?
For tokens like $SHIB, $PEPE, which are supported by communities, their price movements often depend on community cohesion rather than pure market sentiment. As the crypto market becomes more volatile, it’s more important to see if your partners are reliable. During short-term downturns, don’t panic and sell. Some mechanisms impose constraints on dumping behaviors and even provide mining reward compensation for long-term holders.
Final advice: start with small amounts to test, observe community activity and execution, then gradually increase your position. The wealth opportunities in the crypto market ultimately belong to investors who understand how to stick together and support each other.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
blocksnark
· 15h ago
Alright, another article with the theme of "clinging together for warmth"... But then again, I've seen too many lone wolves playing against other lone wolves.
Really? Are those $SHIB guys still holding on? I'm just puzzled, no matter how good the mechanism is, greed can't be protected.
I agree with the idea of small-scale testing first, but when it comes to observing community activity... who can a spam bot really fool?
Long-term perspective is correct; finding the right people is indeed more important than choosing the right coin. But how do you tell who are true believers and who are just trying to run away?
That hits hard. Going solo can indeed be easily exploited, but I've also seen many cases where a group gets exploited together.
I've heard this logic countless times. The real "understanding of clinging together" has long been exploited through information asymmetry.
Feels like they're just hyping up certain projects... But honestly, a community without consensus is just a flock of sheep waiting to be slaughtered.
Mechanism protects long-term participants? Ha, just listen. The last one who said that, how is he doing now?
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 17h ago
It's the same old talk of forming alliances again. While there's some truth to it, it's too idealistic. The so-called "reliable partners" I've seen end up getting cut together. Consensus is a joke; even if the leeks band together, they're still just leeks.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 12-27 14:08
That's right, one person really can't handle it alone. I used to go solo, and as a result, I lost quite a bit of money in a few rug pull projects. It's just my fault for not seeing through the team.
Joining forces is more important than choosing coins, really.
The community needs to be action-oriented, or else it's just an air project.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 12-27 01:49
That's right, you just need to find the right teammates. It's really easy to get wiped out alone in the crypto world.
Once you've identified a good opportunity, you should hold long-term and not play with the group that dumps just to follow the trend.
For community tokens like $SHIB, the key is the community's activity level. If no one is active, the project is doomed.
I agree with the small-scale testing approach; at worst, you won't lose much.
United we stand, brother. The era of going solo is long gone.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 12-27 01:48
Still trying to fool people into forming groups? This kind of rhetoric has been stale for a long time, and in the end, it's still whoever runs faster makes money.
To put it plainly, no matter how perfect the mechanism is, it can't prevent capital from harvesting the leeks. I've seen too many so-called "consensus" collapse overnight.
Liquidity mining and locking up tokens for so long, what's the point? The returns can't even keep up with inflation.
True union, haha, has long been exploited by big players.
$SHIB and similar community coins are just casinos; no matter how strong the cohesion, it can't change the ending.
As for this "small-scale trial first," it sounds reliable. Anyway, just don't go all in.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 12-27 01:48
To be honest, I believe in the idea of forming alliances, but when I see projects promoting "community consensus," I just want to laugh. Most of them are just ways to harvest retail investors again.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 12-27 01:47
That's right, retail investors really need to band together, or they'll get cut to pieces.
Speaking of, choosing teammates is even more important than choosing coins. The several projects I joined before failed because I picked the wrong people.
If I had known that banding together was so crucial, I wouldn't have let so many communities run away one after another. It's still a matter of poor mechanism design.
Working together sounds good, but I'm just worried that someone might secretly dump the market at the end.
I witnessed the power of the community during the $SHIB wave; truly, cohesion is life-saving.
Try small-scale testing and add to your position gradually. A cautious approach depends on who can withstand the volatility.
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapist
· 12-27 01:39
Well said, going solo has long been outdated; forming alliances is the way to go.
---
Look at SHIB and PEPE, they are really supported by the community. Without consensus, they are doomed.
---
The most critical part is mechanism design; projects that protect long-term players are rare.
---
I'm also amazed at the long lock-up period for liquidity mining, but you can't beat the interests tied together.
---
Small-scale testing is a safe move; there's no rush anyway, just observe slowly.
---
Locking funds for several months, is it just for that mining reward, or do you really believe this project can succeed?
---
The biggest fear in the crypto world is retail investors fighting alone and then attacking each other—it's so heartbreaking.
---
You can tell at a glance whether the team is reliable; community activity can't be faked.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 12-27 01:28
To be honest, this set of theories sounds good, but I've seen too many schemes disguised as "community consensus" that ultimately collapsed.
Huddling together for warmth? Ha, I'm just afraid that in the end, you'll find the entire group is full of bagholders.
Really reliable projects don't need to constantly talk about利益绑定; they've already proven themselves with facts.
Instead of obsessing over finding teammates, it's better to learn how to analyze the market yourself and not be brainwashed.
Remember how crazy the SHIB early community was? And now? They're still getting cut.
Making money in the crypto world boils down to mastering two dimensions.
Short-term traders rely on precise timing—the entry and exit points determine success or failure. What do long-term investors rely on? Finding like-minded partners. Many people choose the right track, but still end up losing money. The problem isn't the track itself; it's that they didn't choose the right companions.
What is the fundamental reason most crypto investors continue to incur losses? The era of going it alone is over. In the face of capital, retail investors fight separately, and the result is mutual slaughter. How many projects have you seen launch in less than a week, only for founders to run away, teams to disperse, and community confidence to collapse? That’s the cost of lacking consensus.
Conversely, those participating in liquidity mining understand that the locking period is very long. Why do they still participate? Because they understand a principle: true unity is the only way to fight against being "cut" (exploited). When interests are deeply aligned, everyone works together. Participating in mining, accumulating LP, sharing mining rewards—these mechanisms essentially connect individual gains with the community’s future.
Therefore, when choosing any project or community, ask yourself three questions: Is this team genuinely working? Does the mechanism design protect long-term participants? Is the community consensus strong enough?
For tokens like $SHIB, $PEPE, which are supported by communities, their price movements often depend on community cohesion rather than pure market sentiment. As the crypto market becomes more volatile, it’s more important to see if your partners are reliable. During short-term downturns, don’t panic and sell. Some mechanisms impose constraints on dumping behaviors and even provide mining reward compensation for long-term holders.
Final advice: start with small amounts to test, observe community activity and execution, then gradually increase your position. The wealth opportunities in the crypto market ultimately belong to investors who understand how to stick together and support each other.