True long-term players should look for projects that are aggressively building and hold on without selling.
Here's a simple logic: developers wouldn't be foolish enough to go through the hassle of submitting applications to mainstream app stores unless they are truly planning for the long term. Such tasks are tedious and require a team with a big vision to bother. So, by observing whether a project is seriously laying out its infrastructure in the application ecosystem, you can basically guess whether they are short-term profit-takers or genuinely trying to build something real. Those teams that are truly building will let their actions speak.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybaby
· 5h ago
That's right. The teams that have truly gone through the trouble of getting approval on the App Store do have some substance.
This move is brilliant—directly using "whether it has been listed on the App Store" to filter projects.
But to be honest, I've seen too many projects that made it onto the store but still ended up rugging... Is this kind of judgment really enough?
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 12-27 00:53
That's right, but there are a few more that I can really hold, and I cut myself while watching
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 12-27 00:45
My buddy is right, but after checking around, there aren't many projects that are truly aggressively building.
But on the other hand, launching in app stores doesn't necessarily mean much; some low-key projects actually do things more solidly.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrain
· 12-27 00:43
The King of Coins team launching on app stores truly shows ambition, and this indeed filters out 99% of the air projects.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeacher
· 12-27 00:30
Haha, no doubt about it. I mainly watch who is really messing around in the App Store, and that is indeed a serious signal.
It makes some sense but is not absolute; some projects don't need an app at all and are doing well.
Holding on without selling is the hardest part, even when the mindset collapses.
True builders have already been working quietly without shouting every day.
This logic has some issues; imitation projects also submit apps, but the key is still the frequency of code updates.
I agree, the App Store review process filters out a lot of copycats.
Long-term is long-term, but I still prefer swing trading and don't want to hold forever haha.
True long-term players should look for projects that are aggressively building and hold on without selling.
Here's a simple logic: developers wouldn't be foolish enough to go through the hassle of submitting applications to mainstream app stores unless they are truly planning for the long term. Such tasks are tedious and require a team with a big vision to bother. So, by observing whether a project is seriously laying out its infrastructure in the application ecosystem, you can basically guess whether they are short-term profit-takers or genuinely trying to build something real. Those teams that are truly building will let their actions speak.