High yields are often accompanied by high risks. Take Falcon Finance as an example; its return rate (12%) far exceeds Aave's (3%), and the truth behind this is the custody risk premium. The question is: is this 9% spread truly alpha or risk compensation?



The key lies in how you handle this risk. Instead of completely avoiding it, it's better to learn to coexist—here are three practical approaches.

**Method 1: Hedging Strategy**
The core logic is simple—don't put all your chips on one basket. You can allocate your funds like this: 50% in Falcon Finance for high interest, and the other 50% in stable protocols like Liquity or MakerDAO. If the former experiences de-pegging due to custody issues, you still have the capacity to pick up bargains on DEXs (assuming you judge that this is only a temporary freeze and not a real exit scam). In plain terms, custody risk usually manifests as liquidity crises, rarely leading to complete asset wipeout.

**Method 2: On-Chain Water Level Monitoring**
No project will lock all assets in cold wallets. Daily redemptions require liquidity in hot wallets. Continuously monitoring this indicator can help detect anomalies early—if the funds in hot wallets suddenly dry up, that’s a real danger signal.

This isn’t about turning you into a trading expert, but about maintaining awareness when earning that 9%. Risks themselves are not scary; what’s frightening is ignoring them.
AAVE-0,22%
LQTY0,05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OldLeekMastervip
· 6h ago
A 9% spread sounds attractive, but I still think Aave is more stable... If you have less money, it's better not to bother.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_walletvip
· 12-27 00:45
It's the same story again. Hedging portfolios sound good in theory, but in reality? When a major crash happens, 50% won't be able to save you at all.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHolevip
· 12-27 00:43
It sounds good, but I'm still a bit afraid of the 12% return rate, feeling like it could explode at any time.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClickervip
· 12-27 00:36
A 12% return sounds appealing, but I really don't dare to touch that 9% interest spread... Last time, projects like Falcon crashed, and I couldn't react in time as I watched the on-chain water levels drop.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalistvip
· 12-27 00:34
12% vs 3% The difference... Honestly, I trust the 3% more, and I sleep soundly.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborervip
· 12-27 00:26
50/50? Easier said than done. Only when the anchor drops do you realize what it means to go down together.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)