Many people have faced this dilemma: they see good prospects for the assets in their accounts and don't want to sell, but in real life they urgently need cash. Should they grit their teeth and sell at a loss, or hold on without liquidity? Actually, there's a third way.
The core idea is straightforward: keep your assets intact while extracting liquidity from them. It may sound like a fantasy, but the underlying mechanism is actually simple.
You can lock your cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or even tokenized real-world assets into the protocol's "vault." These assets still belong to you, but are frozen as collateral. The system will then mint an over-collateralized stablecoin—such as USDf—based on the market value of the collateral. This stablecoin can be used directly on-chain for transfers, payments, and even staked into earning versions like sUSDf to generate fixed income. In other words: preserve your position while activating your funds.
Why is supporting a variety of collateral types so crucial? Traditional DeFi protocols usually only recognize a few mainstream assets as collateral. But if the system can accept a broader range of assets, two important changes occur: users don't need to significantly alter their investment allocations to borrow; and real-world assets like bonds and commodity tokens become easier to integrate into on-chain finance. As tokenization of assets becomes a trend, the value of this multi-asset engine will be fully realized.
The core logic of these products isn't about offering astonishingly high yields. The key selling points are transparent mechanisms, ample over-collateralization protection, and predictable, stable returns.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWhisperer
· 12-27 00:51
It sounds like a loan with a disguise, but the key is to clearly understand where the collateral ratio and liquidation line are.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 12-27 00:43
This logic is indeed perfect. You can cash out without selling off your holdings, but I'm worried it might be another ticking time bomb.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 12-27 00:29
Damn, isn't this just lending? Why does it look so fancy... But on the other hand, it does solve a real pain point.
---
Multi-asset collateral sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another scheme to cut the grass and harvest the chives. Let's wait and see how it crashes.
---
Earning fixed income with stablecoins? I just want to ask about the risks. This part wasn't explained clearly.
---
Finally, someone is being thorough. Much more honest than those high-APY scam projects.
---
Hmm, this logic seems applicable everywhere. Why didn't previous protocols think of it?
---
Maintaining a position while leveraging liquidity really hits my needs, but how are the fees calculated?
---
Still the same advice: understand clearly before participating. No free lunch, guys.
---
I'm optimistic about RWA tokenization, but it's still too early.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 12-27 00:29
Isn't this just lending and borrowing? Just a fancy name, what's so amazing about it?
---
Damn, finally someone explains this clearly, so I don't have to struggle between cutting losses and holding positions every time.
---
Multi-asset collateralization is indeed attractive, but how do you calculate the risk? When the protocol has issues, assets can still be liquidated.
---
Wait, isn't the mechanism of USDf just like MakerDAO's? Seems nothing new.
---
Wow, at last there's a reliable solution, no need to be forced to sell coins to get through the crisis.
---
Looks good, but the biggest risk with this kind of product is sudden sharp drops leading to liquidation; over-collateralization can't save it.
---
Honestly, compared to aggressive lending products, I prefer this stable and conservative approach.
---
When you really need cash, who cares about such complicated operations? Isn't selling coins directly faster?
---
Multi-asset support is really key; this way, even my small tokens can come in handy.
---
Why does it feel like another high-risk thing is being packaged as a low-risk product?
Many people have faced this dilemma: they see good prospects for the assets in their accounts and don't want to sell, but in real life they urgently need cash. Should they grit their teeth and sell at a loss, or hold on without liquidity? Actually, there's a third way.
The core idea is straightforward: keep your assets intact while extracting liquidity from them. It may sound like a fantasy, but the underlying mechanism is actually simple.
You can lock your cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or even tokenized real-world assets into the protocol's "vault." These assets still belong to you, but are frozen as collateral. The system will then mint an over-collateralized stablecoin—such as USDf—based on the market value of the collateral. This stablecoin can be used directly on-chain for transfers, payments, and even staked into earning versions like sUSDf to generate fixed income. In other words: preserve your position while activating your funds.
Why is supporting a variety of collateral types so crucial? Traditional DeFi protocols usually only recognize a few mainstream assets as collateral. But if the system can accept a broader range of assets, two important changes occur: users don't need to significantly alter their investment allocations to borrow; and real-world assets like bonds and commodity tokens become easier to integrate into on-chain finance. As tokenization of assets becomes a trend, the value of this multi-asset engine will be fully realized.
The core logic of these products isn't about offering astonishingly high yields. The key selling points are transparent mechanisms, ample over-collateralization protection, and predictable, stable returns.