2025-12-27 00:20:29

Most projects are trying hard to hide their shortcomings and go to great lengths to create a perfect image. But Max's community has taken a different path—they choose to embrace "transparent vulnerability."

What does this mean? It means openly displaying challenges. Localization difficulties, infrastructure limitations, ceilings, mistakes during execution... These are usually kept secret, but the Max community is open to discussing them.

Why? Because they believe in a simple fact: true trust does not come from worshiping a perfect image, but from facing the imperfections of reality together. Systems that dare to expose vulnerabilities often demonstrate the strongest resilience. The honest projects are the ones that last the longest.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CexIsBad

· 11h ago

Ha, finally seeing a project dare to speak frankly upfront, no pretenses—that truly refreshes my perception. To be honest, I am more wary of projects that claim to be perfect in every way; they are usually not far from collapse. I believe in Max's approach; true transparency is the strongest barrier. Another Web3 player enlightened by reality. Compared to those who hide things, I’d rather be with a community that admits to issues. This is what I want to see—there's no perfect chain, only honest people.

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 15h ago

Honest projects last longer, and this data doesn't lie. Bear Bear was impressed by Max's recent moves.

View OriginalReply0

GhostInTheChain

· 12-27 00:50

Oh wow, this is the real gameplay. Most projects are just acting. Max has laid everything out this time. I’m impressed. Honestly, projects that dare to openly admit mistakes are actually more trustworthy. The transparency about vulnerabilities sounds nice, but this is the attitude Web3 should have. Stop pretending to be perfect; it’s exhausting. Honest projects last longer. This really hits home. You have to experience a few rug pulls firsthand to understand. The key is that the community truly bears the burden together with the project, not passing the buck. This sense of collective effort is the real moat.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTherapist

· 12-27 00:47

I quite agree with this approach; it's much more comfortable than those projects that boast about how awesome they are every day. Transparency and vulnerability might sound contradictory, but in practice, they are the strongest moat. But honestly, most communities can't do this. Human nature is to hide flaws, and Max's ability to stick to this logic shows that there's definitely something there.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 12-27 00:46

This is true cleverness—using weaknesses as weapons. Most projects are timid and hesitant, but Max dares to openly discuss them, which actually makes people trust him more. --- Honest projects that last a long time sound good, but how many actually do it? Most end up blowing up. --- Transparency about vulnerabilities sounds good, but in the end, it’s just PR tricks. --- This is the kind of Web3 that should exist. Don’t just put on a facade; face difficulties head-on and solve them together. Community cohesion becomes even stronger. --- But the premise for daring to do this is surviving the initial phase. Projects without funds or traffic playing like this are just courting death. --- Max is indeed a bit different. Looking at vulnerabilities from a different perspective turns them into highlights—interesting.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 12-27 00:44

No hype, no negativity. This transparent approach indeed easily gains loyal followers. Compared to those who constantly promote Bitcoin, honestly, the difficulty seems more reassuring.

View OriginalReply0