Do you really think quantum computing is turning from sci-fi into something tangible for the blockchain space? The conversation around quantum computing's actual threat timeline keeps shifting between "decades away" and "sooner than we think."
For anyone hodling significant crypto, this matters. The theoretical risk to current encryption methods isn't just academic noise anymore—it's becoming a genuine consideration in how people think about long-term asset security. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other major chains are already having serious discussions about quantum-resistant protocols.
Some argue we've got plenty of time before quantum machines crack ECDSA or SHA-256 at scale. Others point out that if someone's already collecting encrypted transaction data now, they could theoretically decrypt it later once quantum computers mature enough.
What's your take? How many years do you think before quantum computing actually becomes a practical factor for crypto holders?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 17h ago
Are you starting to collect data now... It does feel a bit unsettling when you think about it, but I guess it will take ten or eight years before it truly becomes a problem.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 12-27 00:39
Quantum computing, to put it simply, is Schrödinger's threat—both existing and not existing... However, the "harvest now, decrypt later" argument really makes me anxious. Who knows if the data collected now might be decrypted someday?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 12-27 00:36
Wait, I need to track this logic... Is someone accumulating crypto trading data right now? Who's doing this? Large institutions? Intelligence agencies? Where does on-chain evidence point to?
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 12-27 00:35
Quantum computing, to be honest... I'm both nervous and think it's still early. It feels overhyped like Y2K, but the logic of collecting data and decrypting it really can't be held back.
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 12-27 00:25
Quantum, to put it simply, is Schrödinger's threat... It hasn't even arrived yet and has already been hyped to death.
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 12-27 00:23
To be honest, I neither fully believe nor completely disbelieve in quantum computing. Anyway, no matter how intense the discussions among these big shots are, it still depends on who can develop something truly usable first.
Do you really think quantum computing is turning from sci-fi into something tangible for the blockchain space? The conversation around quantum computing's actual threat timeline keeps shifting between "decades away" and "sooner than we think."
For anyone hodling significant crypto, this matters. The theoretical risk to current encryption methods isn't just academic noise anymore—it's becoming a genuine consideration in how people think about long-term asset security. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other major chains are already having serious discussions about quantum-resistant protocols.
Some argue we've got plenty of time before quantum machines crack ECDSA or SHA-256 at scale. Others point out that if someone's already collecting encrypted transaction data now, they could theoretically decrypt it later once quantum computers mature enough.
What's your take? How many years do you think before quantum computing actually becomes a practical factor for crypto holders?