I just came across an interesting trading pair—the trading characteristics of a certain crypto asset on the BSC chain via Uniswap in the past 24 hours are worth noting.
Buy volume is sporadic (24-hour buy volume $0), while sell volume is about $23, indicating that market liquidity is relatively sparse with limited trading depth. Liquidity reserves are only $1,965, which appears particularly thin given the overall market capitalization.
Interestingly, the market cap of this project has already expanded to approximately $4.074 billion. This huge disparity between liquidity and market cap usually reflects some imbalance in market structure—possibly due to early locking of tokens, low trading activity, or potential pump-and-dump risks.
For friends who want to track on-chain project performance, such extreme liquidity-to-market cap ratios are indeed worth investigating thoroughly before trading—don't be fooled by shiny numbers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCry
· 12-27 05:54
Wait a minute... A buy volume of 0 and a sell of $23? What kind of Ponzi scheme would it take to inflate a market cap of over 4 billion?
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 12-27 00:36
Buy 0, sell 23, with liquidity less than 2k... This is ridiculous, over 4 billion market cap supporting such a small amount? It's a typical pump and dump warning sign.
I wouldn't dare touch this kind of project; the impressive numbers are just illusions.
What are retail investors still researching? This is just a trap.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 12-27 00:35
Oh my, over 4 billion in market cap but only $1965 in liquidity? Isn't this just obvious money grabbing?
View OriginalReply0
RugDocDetective
· 12-27 00:26
Wow, only 2k liquidity with a 4 billion market cap? The level of absurdity is beyond my desire to even comment.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 12-27 00:24
This liquidity ratio is a bit suspicious... A market cap of over 4 billion with only a $1965 pool? Isn't this just waiting for a sandwich attack?
---
There must be something hidden in the mempool. I've seen too many cases of $0 buy-in volume.
---
Wait, is this a typical rug pull sign? Or is the mining pool relationship causing trouble?
---
Theoretically, arbitrage space is unlimited, but actual slippage can wipe out your capital... I usually avoid this kind of market.
---
Flash loans could potentially smash this market through, it's too risky brother.
---
$0 buy-in volume? Even the script bots have given up, what does that mean?
---
Something's off. Gas fees are not worth optimizing for in this market. Pass.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 12-27 00:21
A market cap of 4 billion with only 1965 liquidity? Isn't this a typical pump-and-dump scam? You can't even buy it, and you can't sell it either.
I just came across an interesting trading pair—the trading characteristics of a certain crypto asset on the BSC chain via Uniswap in the past 24 hours are worth noting.
Buy volume is sporadic (24-hour buy volume $0), while sell volume is about $23, indicating that market liquidity is relatively sparse with limited trading depth. Liquidity reserves are only $1,965, which appears particularly thin given the overall market capitalization.
Interestingly, the market cap of this project has already expanded to approximately $4.074 billion. This huge disparity between liquidity and market cap usually reflects some imbalance in market structure—possibly due to early locking of tokens, low trading activity, or potential pump-and-dump risks.
For friends who want to track on-chain project performance, such extreme liquidity-to-market cap ratios are indeed worth investigating thoroughly before trading—don't be fooled by shiny numbers.