2025-12-26 23:27:57

Are there any blockchain games of the Minecraft/SIMS type that are stronger than the current projects? Honestly, putting these high-difficulty games on small-cap projects is a complete waste. With such a complex tech stack, using mini-level funding to develop them is simply digging your own grave. Just look at the projects that have launched—good ideas, but the execution falls short, and in the end, they are ruthlessly corrected by the market. The disconnect between technical investment and market value is clear; all that awaits these projects is increasingly slow development and gradually becoming forgotten games. Unless genuine institutional capital steps in to support, this path won't go far.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlatlineTrader

· 15h ago

Really, small financing to make big games is just a trap. Insufficient funding and the need to keep up with technology just don't add up. To put it simply, the team overestimates itself, and reality will slap them in the face. For this type of project, you either latch onto a big backer or wait to die; there's no third way.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 12-26 23:49

Honestly, without enough funding, you can't really play this kind of game. Apeing small-cap chain games are purely gambler's mentality. If you can't grasp the technology, won't understand the market cap, and can't push it up, then just wait to cool off.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 12-26 23:49

Basically, it's small funding for big dreams. Currently, blockchain game projects are all going to fail. Insufficient funding, no matter how advanced the technology is, is useless. Without institutional capital, these projects are doomed. Looking at those launched games, each one is more disappointing than the last. Ideas are just ideas. With the complexity of Minecraft, mini funding really can't handle it. Just wait to be taught a lesson by the market. History always repeats itself. This track requires real money to invest; otherwise, it's all just illusions.

View OriginalReply0

DeFi_Dad_Jokes

· 12-26 23:44

Basically, it's a pancake game dream, a small town financing fate. If institutions don't come, even the best ideas are useless. Really, doing complex chain games with small funds is almost like naked swimming. Wait, is there anyone really using institutional money to do this? Just looking at it is exhausting; projects that can't keep up with financing progress are basically dead. This wave of technical requirements is too outrageous, no wonder they've all failed.

View OriginalReply0

OnlyUpOnly

· 12-26 23:36

Honestly, I haven't seen anything truly playable; it's all PPT games. Institutional capital isn't entering the market, and small financing teams are destined to fail. Want to create a blockchain game with the difficulty of Minecraft? You can't do it without at least a few million dollars.

View OriginalReply0

LucidSleepwalker

· 12-26 23:34

That's right, if the funding isn't in place, forcing to take on such a tough project will only lead to failure sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

MevSandwich

· 12-26 23:32

There's nothing wrong with that; raising less capital and trying to make big games is basically a dead end. --- Complex blockchain games + small funding, this combination is a recipe for failure. --- These projects are really just idealistic but poorly executed; they should have been reshuffled long ago. --- Blockchain games like Minecraft without institutional backing simply can't survive, that's the truth. --- Small-cap teams working on such heavy games, if the development cycle is long, they are doomed; I've seen too many cases. --- Instead of waiting for these projects, it's better to see which ones have real funding behind them. --- With such a heavy tech stack and no money, they'll be forgotten sooner or later; that's inevitable.

View OriginalReply0