It's striking how differently the market has rewarded developers across cycles. During the memecoin boom, projects shipping barely-functional prototypes and largely untested features were pulling in eight-figure valuations like clockwork. The bar for what passed as a product was, frankly, pretty low—as long as hype and community momentum were there, technical substance took a backseat.
Fast forward to now. Developers building serious infrastructure like containerized AGI systems, tackling genuinely hard technical problems and pushing the boundaries of what's possible in this space, are grinding away for five-figure paydays if they're lucky. The incentive structure feels completely inverted. Raw innovation and technical ambition used to be treated as afterthoughts in bull market euphoria, yet somehow they're even more undersold in the current environment.
The irony isn't lost—the market still seems better at pricing hype than genuine breakthrough work.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBard
· 10h ago
ngl the market's just built different when sentiment flips... watching devs pour years into actual problems while jpeg flippers made bank is peak crypto tragedy tbh
Reply0
SellTheBounce
· 12-26 23:49
Buy the dip again; there’s always a lower point. This time is the same old trick, and those who truly get things done are always the last to take the plunge.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 12-26 23:49
The market always rewards storytellers, not coders. This is Web3.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 12-26 23:39
This is the magic of crypto—creating a worthless coin can raise hundreds of millions, while those truly working on technology have to struggle for funding.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 12-26 23:34
Uh... so the people who actually do the work end up not making money? This market is just a joke.
View OriginalReply0
SybilSlayer
· 12-26 23:28
ngl, this is the magical realism of the crypto market... Small workshops speculating on coins are making eight figures, while those truly building infrastructure are struggling with five figures, it's completely outrageous.
It's striking how differently the market has rewarded developers across cycles. During the memecoin boom, projects shipping barely-functional prototypes and largely untested features were pulling in eight-figure valuations like clockwork. The bar for what passed as a product was, frankly, pretty low—as long as hype and community momentum were there, technical substance took a backseat.
Fast forward to now. Developers building serious infrastructure like containerized AGI systems, tackling genuinely hard technical problems and pushing the boundaries of what's possible in this space, are grinding away for five-figure paydays if they're lucky. The incentive structure feels completely inverted. Raw innovation and technical ambition used to be treated as afterthoughts in bull market euphoria, yet somehow they're even more undersold in the current environment.
The irony isn't lost—the market still seems better at pricing hype than genuine breakthrough work.