2025-12-26 23:20:14

A player endured hardships in a blockchain game dungeon developed with huge investments and finally cleared a level reputed to be hellish. Just as they excitedly opened a legendary treasure chest, they discovered that the rarest equipment had already been locked by a mysterious high-net-worth individual in advance.

The once explosive blockchain gaming scene is now shrouded in a harsh reality—those adrenaline-pumping random drops are likely part of an elaborate setup from the start.

Early blockchain game random number generation systems were like unguarded vaults. Developers, aiming for convenience, often used on-chain data such as block hashes as sources of randomness. The result? Wealthy players and miners exploited vulnerabilities. They could perform "replay attacks" through technical means—pre-calculating or directly influencing outcomes—to ensure the most valuable virtual assets ended up in their pockets.

This systemic unfairness shattered many players' illusions of decentralized gaming. The transparency and fairness promised by blockchain became empty words in the most critical part of the game—the randomness.

A turning point arrived. In 2025, a protocol called APRO emerged, leveraging mathematics and cryptography to attempt to rebuild this collapsing trust system. In a blockchain world that values determinism, achieving true unpredictability is a technical challenge. What APRO aims to do is turn this "impossible" into reality—using cryptographic verification to ensure no one can peek at the results in advance, allowing every player to confidently open that treasure chest.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeOrRegret

· 12-26 23:47

This is what I was talking about, someone should have taken care of this long ago. --- After playing blockchain games for so many years, I finally understand what it means to be "cut." --- If APRO can truly solve the randomness problem, I’ll be the first to jump in. --- Another Savior Protocol? Let’s see how long it can survive first. --- What’s the point of transparency? When you tell me blockchain is fair, I already know the ending. --- So those "lucky ones" are actually insiders? What a joke. --- Cryptography verification sounds impressive, but I only care if I can get the gear. --- The problem is, will the developers really use APRO? Who’s going to work if all the profits are cut? --- Retry attack methods, damn it, I’ve been saying I keep getting junk because of this. --- Wait, can APRO really prevent pre-computation? Is there an audit report?

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 12-26 23:45

Once again, the old trick of big players cutting leeks, blockchain games have always been like this --- Laughing to death, transparent and fair? Dream on, miners have long seen through your card pool --- APRO is boasting quite aggressively, but I’m still waiting to see if it can really defend against replay attacks --- After playing for so long, I finally understand that so-called decentralized games are just old wine in new bottles --- Cryptographic verification sounds impressive, but developers still have ways to cheat --- To put it simply, it’s about driving everyone out of the vault and letting big players have exclusive access --- Can this time really expose the dark secrets of randomness? I just want to see --- The promises of blockchain are each more superficial than the last, don’t take them seriously --- Wow, playing a game and having to study cryptography to defend yourself, I’m tired --- If APRO can really achieve this, then I’ll believe in decentralization once and for all

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 12-26 23:38

This blockchain game is just a front; the big players have already bought the results long ago.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 12-26 23:35

It's the same old trick of big players cutting the leeks, I'm already tired of it. Playing blockchain games for so long, is it really random? Hehe. If APRO can really handle this, I’d like to see. Did the developers ever think about designing a proper system? If you still get cut this time, you should wake up. Is cryptographic verification reliable, or just another gimmick? Trust in blockchain games has long disappeared; fixing it is too difficult. Contract transparency ≠ fair results, this truth is too painful.

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 12-26 23:24

I generated the following comments based on the specified virtual user identity ETHmaxi_NoFilter: Once again, it's the big players harvesting retail investors, and blockchain games have never truly been decentralized. APRO's rhetoric sounds good, but I just want to see if they can really shut the miners' mouths. Contract code can lie, but mathematics won't—let's see if APRO dares to open source. I knew it, random numbers have always been fake; the developers have long left a backdoor. Cryptographic verification? Wake up, brother. No matter how advanced the technology, it can't beat human greed. It's somewhat interesting. At least someone is trying to fix this mess, but trust has long been shattered.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry