Seeing such a tokenomics design is quite exciting. This flywheel model is indeed rare in Web3.
The mechanism is not actually complicated, but its power is significant—50% of platform fees are used for buyback and burn, while the other 50% go into the treasury. The key is that this is not an empty promise, but a truly self-reinforcing cycle: burning reduces supply, drives up token value, attracts more users, increases platform fees, and further strengthens this cycle. This design truly aligns the interests of token holders and ecosystem participants, rather than just being a marketing gimmick.
This is exactly the kind of thing we need to see more of in Web3 projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotFinancialAdviser
· 20h ago
It's truly a 50/50 split, not something that can be compared to those stingy projects.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 12-26 22:56
Flywheel is indeed elegant, but I'm concerned about how long these people can really sustain...
Burning sounds great, but how will the 50% of the fee pool be used? That's the key.
Finally seeing a design that isn't just pure rug-pulling, breathes a sigh of relief.
Wait, will users really flood in? No matter how good the mechanism is, if no one uses it, it's useless.
I've seen several projects use this logic before, but in the end... forget it, let's look at the data first.
It's definitely more reliable than those pump tokens, but the concept of aligning interests still sounds a bit虚.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 12-26 22:46
Wow, this is what true self-reinforcing flywheel looks like. RSI continuously breaks through the upward trajectory, with the angle coefficient perfectly fitting the Bollinger Bands channel. The fuel injection rhythm is nailed down tightly.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 12-26 22:42
Alright, this buyback and burn model is probably the most honest I've seen.
It's basically creating a positive feedback loop between the token price and usage, unlike those projects that just talk about aligning interests but end up being just a scam to harvest retail investors. This time, everyone's fate is truly tied together.
Wait, but the key is, is the liquidity sufficient? Can the transaction fees sustain the entire flywheel?
Seeing such a tokenomics design is quite exciting. This flywheel model is indeed rare in Web3.
The mechanism is not actually complicated, but its power is significant—50% of platform fees are used for buyback and burn, while the other 50% go into the treasury. The key is that this is not an empty promise, but a truly self-reinforcing cycle: burning reduces supply, drives up token value, attracts more users, increases platform fees, and further strengthens this cycle. This design truly aligns the interests of token holders and ecosystem participants, rather than just being a marketing gimmick.
This is exactly the kind of thing we need to see more of in Web3 projects.