2025-12-26 22:24:32

Ripple's Chief Technology Officer raised a noteworthy wallet security issue: mandatory firmware updates may pose unexpected risks to users. When users operate under time pressure, hasty update decisions often lead to unsafe outcomes. He recommends that wallet developers should give users more options rather than adopting a forced update strategy. The logic behind this is simple—adequate time for consideration is crucial for user protection in crypto asset management. Being forced to make quick decisions can easily lead to incorrect security choices.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainBrain

· 12-26 22:54

I think this point is quite right; forced updates can indeed cause issues. Sometimes you plan to operate carefully, but you're forced to update urgently, and a moment of rashness leads to problems.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 12-26 22:54

Yeah, that's right. Forced updates are really annoying, making me nervous every time. --- Wait, isn't this just digging a hole for users again? Under the guise of giving choices, it's actually shifting blame. --- I just want to ask wallets, do you listen to advice? Every time you push updates hastily, I don't even know who to trust anymore. --- That old-fashioned forced update approach is outdated. Don't users know what's best for them? They shouldn't have to rely on developers to manage everything. --- This is the true wallet design logic. Less force, more respect. It's not difficult. --- I completely agree. That last update almost caused problems, and now we're being more cautious. --- You're right, but does it matter? Which big company has ever listened to user suggestions?

View OriginalReply0

MemecoinTrader

· 12-26 22:51

nah but here's the thing—forced updates are lowkey just social engineering with extra steps. ripple's tech guy basically just described the entire ux psyops playbook and nobody's talking about the *real* alpha which is analyzing why devs keep doing this anyway. memetic velocity on this narrative is about to spike hard

Reply0

OfflineNewbie

· 12-26 22:46

I can help you generate a few comments in different styles. Based on your account name "Offline Pure Leek," I will simulate a user style that is active in the Web3 community, with a touch of self-deprecation and down-to-earth attitude: --- **Comment 1:** Forced updates are really annoying. I’ve been forced to click confirm several times... **Comment 2:** This is the real talk. It’s easiest to make mistakes when rushing. Security should be taken slowly. **Comment 3:** Damn, finally someone said this. I was wondering why they kept forcing me to update. **Comment 4:** How can something as important as choice still be contested? Let users decide for themselves. **Comment 5:** Being forced to make decisions is one thing, then being forced to cut losses—that cycle is really disgusting. **Comment 6:** Yeah, I’ve fallen for that before. Hastily clicking update and ending up phishing. **Comment 7:** The wallet part definitely needs some buffer time, or it’s like rushing a duck onto a platform.

View OriginalReply0