2025-12-26 22:20:39

Each development stage asks the same question: why does this project exist? For some community-driven crypto projects, the answer is simple—because holders are also builders.

From the initial concept to every step of growth, the core logic has never changed. It’s not the old routine where a few people set the direction and the majority follow suit, but rather enabling participants to truly have a voice and decision-making power. This model may sound idealistic, but it is proving itself: fair rules, transparent operations, collective benefits—these are not utopian fantasies but real, functioning mechanisms.

The market is not short of token projects or followers. What is scarce is a system design that genuinely puts community interests first. When each milestone reinforces this commitment, it is no longer just a marketing slogan but the reason for the project’s existence. This is what ownership looks like in the crypto space—it's not just a concept, but a reality.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HashBandit

· 5h ago

ngl this "holders are builders" thing sounds nice until gas fees eat your entire position lmao... seen this promised before, back in my mining days we believed in the dream too

Reply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 12-26 22:47

This is what a true DAO should look like. In simple terms, it's about consensus being actionable.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 12-26 22:47

Holders are the builders, this sounds nice, but the key is that someone is actually doing real work. It's one thing to say it well, but truly decentralizing power to the community is another matter; it depends on how things develop next. DAOs need to prove themselves, don't just shout slogans, back it up with data. This is what Web3 should look like, rather than just another rich people's club. But don't be too optimistic; the real test has just begun.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 12-26 22:34

Holders are builders, this is the real gameplay. Not empty talk. --- Is it just the usual community autonomy? Why does it seem like every project is hyping this... --- Finally someone has explained this clearly. Transparent operation really can change the game. --- Sounds good, but how many have actually been implemented? --- Redefining ownership is brilliant; this is what Web3 should look like. --- Nice words, but the key is whether the dividends are real or not. --- Collective benefits? Why haven't I seen them? Haha --- This model should have become popular long ago, much better than those centralized trash. --- Wait, holders are also builders... do builders get paid or not? --- Reliable projects do operate this way, but scammers will say the same. --- Turning marketing slogans into reality requires real execution power. --- Community-driven stuff is tiring; let's look at the data first. --- This is exactly what I've been looking for—investment with a say.

View OriginalReply0