2025-12-26 22:20:10

#数字资产市场动态 European regulators are building a policy defense line around $BTC

From recent developments, it is clear that the EU is upgrading its management of crypto assets. From the implementation of the MiCA framework to stricter reviews of Bitcoin trading platforms by national central banks, all these point in the same direction— a more stringent regulatory environment is taking shape.

This is not sudden. Instead, it is a natural result of a series of risk events over the past few years (exchange collapses, money laundering cases surfacing). Major economies are asking the same question: how can we find a balance between open innovation and risk prevention?

What does this mean for market participants? Increased compliance costs, potential fragmentation of liquidity, and some small exchanges may be unable to continue operations. But from another perspective, it also filters out platforms with genuine governance capabilities.

Anyway, the value properties of $BTC will not change because of the regulatory framework, but the trading environment is indeed being reshaped.

BTC0,11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiHeir

· 12-26 22:47

It should be pointed out that your analysis framework has a fatal flaw — treating the emergence of MiCA as some kind of progress. That's hilarious. It precisely proves the fiat system's fear of decentralization, my friend.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 12-26 22:46

My comment: Europe's move is indeed fierce. The implementation of the MiCA framework will make small exchanges cry, but to be honest, larger platforms are actually more stable. The ones that are filtered out are the real gold bricks.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 12-26 22:46

Europe's wave of regulation has truly arrived; small exchanges should be nervous. It's both MiCA and scrutiny, and compliance costs are skyrocketing, but honestly, the big players will be even bigger after this. BTC's fundamental nature remains unchanged; it all depends on who can survive until the end. A bunch of small platforms are either dead or severely hurt, but isn't that normal? They should have been cleared out long ago.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityNewbie

· 12-26 22:32

Europe is starting another round, is MiCA implementation the end? Small exchanges are probably doomed. Regulation... it's something you can't escape from. Who bears the compliance costs? In the end, retail investors will foot the bill. BTC's properties can't change, but liquidity fragmentation is the real trap. When good prices become hard to find, who will be responsible? It's politely called platform screening; frankly, it's just the big eating the small. What’s really interesting is how those big platforms will respond to rising costs—this will determine who survives and who doesn't in the next round.

View OriginalReply0

down_only_larry

· 12-26 22:24

Europe's move is quite aggressive; small exchanges really should just give up and go to sleep. --- With MiCA coming, compliance costs skyrocket, but big players still make money; it's just retail investors who face trouble. --- Basically, it's still the same few big platforms monopolizing, and the regulatory framework is just helping them clear the field. --- It's true that Bitcoin's value remains unchanged, but liquidity fragmentation is the real pitfall. --- Who survives this wave of regulation will be the true winners; survival of the fittest.

View OriginalReply0