AT Token: How Distribution Mechanisms Support the Imagination of an Ecosystem
This is an old question: how should a new coin be distributed to both incentivize participants and prevent dumping? AT provides its own answer.
The total supply of AT is capped at 1 billion tokens, which itself is a signal. The key next step is how to distribute—25% goes to the ecosystem fund (250 million tokens), with the straightforward purpose of supporting the community and ecosystem projects; another 20% (200 million tokens) is allocated to stakers who want to participate in network consensus maintenance and earn rewards; investors also receive 20% (200 million tokens), as early supporter rewards.
What about the rest? 15% is unlocked directly into the public market at TGE (150 million tokens), the team holds 10% but must lock it for the long term (100 million tokens)—this design is interesting, aiming to prevent founders from fleeing or dumping. The foundation uses 5% for operations (50 million tokens), with 3% reserved for liquidity (30 million tokens), and the final 2% allocated for market promotion (20 million tokens).
Looking at the data, the initial circulating supply is 230 million tokens, accounting for 23%. This proportion isn't particularly aggressive, providing the ecosystem with a relatively stable startup phase. The TGE is scheduled for October 24, 2025, with the team’s lock-up mechanism and the 48-month distribution plan for the ecosystem fund all pointing to the same goal: extending the timeline and reducing short-term selling pressure.
AT itself has four main uses: governance voting rights, staking rewards, data node incentives, and ecosystem development support. These four functions support each other, forming a self-consistent closed loop—using AT for governance incentivizes staking; staking motivates supporting nodes and ecosystem projects. In theory, this can create positive feedback, but execution remains the challenge.
Overall, this distribution mechanism follows a cyclical logic: using the fund to incentivize the ecosystem, a thriving ecosystem boosts demand, higher demand drives up the token price, and rising prices attract more participation. Whether this can succeed depends on actual project progress and market recognition.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinSkeptic
· 9h ago
23% circulating supply? Sounds pretty stable, but this self-consistent closed loop sounds good in theory. In practice, it still depends on whether the ecosystem has real demand.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 9h ago
Basically, it's about gambling on execution; no matter how perfect the theoretical logic is on paper, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
WalletAnxietyPatient
· 9h ago
It's locking up and distributing again. Basically, it's just fear of dumping.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 9h ago
It's the same old trick again. They all sound nice about the ecosystem, but in reality, it's just about who runs away first.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 9h ago
ngl the 48-month vesting schedule is just copium theater if execution doesn't follow through... we've seen this movie before tbh
Reply0
RunWithRugs
· 9h ago
Wait, can team lock-up really prevent a scam? History has shown us it can't.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalker
· 10h ago
1 billion coins locked, distributed over 48 months, do you have both imagination and patience? I've seen this routine too many times.
The distribution looks balanced, but the real measure is whether the ecosystem fund can actually fund projects.
A 10% team lock-up actually seems more credible; at least they're not scammers.
The same old problem remains—the theoretical closed loop and actual execution are worlds apart.
Let's see how it unfolds after October 2025; anything said now is just talking to the wind.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 10h ago
This allocation mechanism looks like a game of wordplay to me: fund incentives for the ecosystem, ecosystem boosting the token price, token price attracting participation... It's a circular argument. The key still depends on whether there are real projects with actual funding landing.
AT Token: How Distribution Mechanisms Support the Imagination of an Ecosystem
This is an old question: how should a new coin be distributed to both incentivize participants and prevent dumping? AT provides its own answer.
The total supply of AT is capped at 1 billion tokens, which itself is a signal. The key next step is how to distribute—25% goes to the ecosystem fund (250 million tokens), with the straightforward purpose of supporting the community and ecosystem projects; another 20% (200 million tokens) is allocated to stakers who want to participate in network consensus maintenance and earn rewards; investors also receive 20% (200 million tokens), as early supporter rewards.
What about the rest? 15% is unlocked directly into the public market at TGE (150 million tokens), the team holds 10% but must lock it for the long term (100 million tokens)—this design is interesting, aiming to prevent founders from fleeing or dumping. The foundation uses 5% for operations (50 million tokens), with 3% reserved for liquidity (30 million tokens), and the final 2% allocated for market promotion (20 million tokens).
Looking at the data, the initial circulating supply is 230 million tokens, accounting for 23%. This proportion isn't particularly aggressive, providing the ecosystem with a relatively stable startup phase. The TGE is scheduled for October 24, 2025, with the team’s lock-up mechanism and the 48-month distribution plan for the ecosystem fund all pointing to the same goal: extending the timeline and reducing short-term selling pressure.
AT itself has four main uses: governance voting rights, staking rewards, data node incentives, and ecosystem development support. These four functions support each other, forming a self-consistent closed loop—using AT for governance incentivizes staking; staking motivates supporting nodes and ecosystem projects. In theory, this can create positive feedback, but execution remains the challenge.
Overall, this distribution mechanism follows a cyclical logic: using the fund to incentivize the ecosystem, a thriving ecosystem boosts demand, higher demand drives up the token price, and rising prices attract more participation. Whether this can succeed depends on actual project progress and market recognition.