UBS has reaffirmed its Neutral stance on FirstEnergy (NYSE: FE) as of December 17, 2025, signaling a cautious approach to the utility stock. Despite maintaining this balanced view, the analyst community’s price projections tell a different story—with an average one-year target of $50.61 per share, suggesting potential gains of 13.76% from the stock’s December 6 closing price of $44.49.
Price Target Breakdown
The consensus among analysts shows considerable variation in expectations. Forecasts range widely from a conservative $44.87 to an optimistic $56.70, reflecting uncertainty about the company’s near-term direction. This variance underscores why UBS’s neutral assessment may serve as a useful safety switch for cautious investors. Revenue projections for FirstEnergy indicate a decline to 12,466MM annually, down 12.72% year-over-year, while projected non-GAAP EPS stands at 2.84.
Institutional Positioning and Sentiment
The institutional investor community shows growing confidence in FirstEnergy. A total of 1,526 funds and institutions maintain positions in the company, representing a 0.07% increase in ownership from the prior quarter. Notably, total institutional shareholding has expanded by 2.25% to 635,912K shares. The put/call ratio of 0.73 suggests a decidedly bullish market sentiment, contrasting with UBS’s neutral recommendation and providing investors with a more optimistic neutral safety switch alternative.
Average portfolio allocation across all funds dedicated to FirstEnergy stands at 0.17%, up 7.83% this quarter—indicating growing fund manager interest despite the cautious analyst guidance.
Major Stakeholder Activity
Capital World Investors remains the largest institutional holder with 78,328K shares (13.56% ownership), having increased its stake by 0.39% in the most recent filing. The firm boosted its FE portfolio weighting by 7.37% over the quarter, signaling strengthened conviction.
Blackstone Group holds 28,832K shares representing 4.99% of the company, maintaining its position without adjustment. AMECX’s Income Fund of America expanded its holdings to 23,663K shares (4.10% stake), up 6.53% from prior filings, while increasing its portfolio allocation by 1.50%.
Washington Mutual Investors Fund (AWSHX) now owns 21,234K shares (3.68% ownership), representing a 7.18% increase from previous holdings, though it trimmed its portfolio weighting by 1.85%. American Funds Fundamental Investors (ANCFX) maintains 20,879K shares (3.61% stake) with no recent changes to its position.
What This Means for Investors
The divergence between UBS’s neutral rating and positive price targets, combined with growing institutional demand and bullish options sentiment, creates an interesting market dynamic. While the neutral safety switch may appeal to risk-averse investors, the underlying institutional accumulation and upside potential deserve consideration for those with moderate risk tolerance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
FirstEnergy Stock Analysis: UBS Maintains Neutral Safety Switch Amid Mixed Market Signals
The Analyst Perspective
UBS has reaffirmed its Neutral stance on FirstEnergy (NYSE: FE) as of December 17, 2025, signaling a cautious approach to the utility stock. Despite maintaining this balanced view, the analyst community’s price projections tell a different story—with an average one-year target of $50.61 per share, suggesting potential gains of 13.76% from the stock’s December 6 closing price of $44.49.
Price Target Breakdown
The consensus among analysts shows considerable variation in expectations. Forecasts range widely from a conservative $44.87 to an optimistic $56.70, reflecting uncertainty about the company’s near-term direction. This variance underscores why UBS’s neutral assessment may serve as a useful safety switch for cautious investors. Revenue projections for FirstEnergy indicate a decline to 12,466MM annually, down 12.72% year-over-year, while projected non-GAAP EPS stands at 2.84.
Institutional Positioning and Sentiment
The institutional investor community shows growing confidence in FirstEnergy. A total of 1,526 funds and institutions maintain positions in the company, representing a 0.07% increase in ownership from the prior quarter. Notably, total institutional shareholding has expanded by 2.25% to 635,912K shares. The put/call ratio of 0.73 suggests a decidedly bullish market sentiment, contrasting with UBS’s neutral recommendation and providing investors with a more optimistic neutral safety switch alternative.
Average portfolio allocation across all funds dedicated to FirstEnergy stands at 0.17%, up 7.83% this quarter—indicating growing fund manager interest despite the cautious analyst guidance.
Major Stakeholder Activity
Capital World Investors remains the largest institutional holder with 78,328K shares (13.56% ownership), having increased its stake by 0.39% in the most recent filing. The firm boosted its FE portfolio weighting by 7.37% over the quarter, signaling strengthened conviction.
Blackstone Group holds 28,832K shares representing 4.99% of the company, maintaining its position without adjustment. AMECX’s Income Fund of America expanded its holdings to 23,663K shares (4.10% stake), up 6.53% from prior filings, while increasing its portfolio allocation by 1.50%.
Washington Mutual Investors Fund (AWSHX) now owns 21,234K shares (3.68% ownership), representing a 7.18% increase from previous holdings, though it trimmed its portfolio weighting by 1.85%. American Funds Fundamental Investors (ANCFX) maintains 20,879K shares (3.61% stake) with no recent changes to its position.
What This Means for Investors
The divergence between UBS’s neutral rating and positive price targets, combined with growing institutional demand and bullish options sentiment, creates an interesting market dynamic. While the neutral safety switch may appeal to risk-averse investors, the underlying institutional accumulation and upside potential deserve consideration for those with moderate risk tolerance.