Gold has demonstrated remarkable performance in 2025, with prices climbing 62% year-to-date through mid-December. This marks potentially the strongest calendar year in over a century. While many view precious metals as inflation protection or defensive holdings, the reality is more nuanced. With the S&P 500 advancing over 14% and inflation moderating to 3%, gold’s true value lies in its role as a volatility hedge and portfolio diversifier. Historical data shows near-zero correlation between U.S. equities and gold, making it an effective risk management tool for long-term investors.
The Cost Factor: Why Expense Ratios Matter
When selecting a gold ETF, one principle dominates: minimize what you can control. Since most physical gold ETFs hold identical assets—bullion stored in secure vaults—the differentiator comes down to fees. Every basis point of expense ratio or trading spread directly impacts your returns over time. This is where careful product selection becomes crucial.
Top Physical Gold ETF Options for 2026
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM)
The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) remains the largest player in the gold ETF space, but its 0.40% expense ratio makes it an expensive choice. State Street responded by launching the SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM), which slashes costs to just 0.10%. With over $25 billion in assets under management, GLDM maintains excellent liquidity and minimal trading spreads—truly the hallmark of a cost-conscious investor’s choice. The lower share price structure also makes entry more accessible for investors with limited capital.
iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM)
iShares offers a similar strategy with its gold offerings. The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) commands a 0.25% fee—reasonable but not competitive. The iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) emerges as the winner in the ETF cost battle, charging just 0.09%. While its $6 billion asset base trails larger competitors, it provides more than sufficient liquidity and trading efficiency. IAUM’s modest share price enhances accessibility for retail investors seeking gold exposure without premium fees.
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL)
For investors prioritizing sustainability, the abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) offers a differentiated approach. At 0.17%, its expense ratio sits between GLDM and IAUM, but the real advantage lies in its commitment to responsible sourcing. All post-2012 gold adheres to London Bullion Market Association standards, ensuring environmental compliance and elimination of unethical financing. If ESG principles guide your investment decisions, SGOL merits consideration despite modestly higher costs.
Making Your Selection
The reality of physical gold ETFs is their fundamental similarity—all hold genuine bullion. Your decision should hinge on cost efficiency. For most investors, IAUM’s ultra-low 0.09% expense ratio represents the best value, followed closely by GLDM’s 0.10% structure. Those with ESG convictions might justify SGOL’s additional basis points for responsible gold sourcing.
Gold’s share price movements in 2025 underscore its value as a long-term portfolio component. By selecting low-cost ETF vehicles, you ensure more capital compounds on your behalf rather than enriching fund managers through excessive fees.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Finding Your Ideal Gold ETF in 2026: A Smart Investor's Guide
The Case for Gold as a Portfolio Hedge
Gold has demonstrated remarkable performance in 2025, with prices climbing 62% year-to-date through mid-December. This marks potentially the strongest calendar year in over a century. While many view precious metals as inflation protection or defensive holdings, the reality is more nuanced. With the S&P 500 advancing over 14% and inflation moderating to 3%, gold’s true value lies in its role as a volatility hedge and portfolio diversifier. Historical data shows near-zero correlation between U.S. equities and gold, making it an effective risk management tool for long-term investors.
The Cost Factor: Why Expense Ratios Matter
When selecting a gold ETF, one principle dominates: minimize what you can control. Since most physical gold ETFs hold identical assets—bullion stored in secure vaults—the differentiator comes down to fees. Every basis point of expense ratio or trading spread directly impacts your returns over time. This is where careful product selection becomes crucial.
Top Physical Gold ETF Options for 2026
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM)
The SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) remains the largest player in the gold ETF space, but its 0.40% expense ratio makes it an expensive choice. State Street responded by launching the SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM), which slashes costs to just 0.10%. With over $25 billion in assets under management, GLDM maintains excellent liquidity and minimal trading spreads—truly the hallmark of a cost-conscious investor’s choice. The lower share price structure also makes entry more accessible for investors with limited capital.
iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM)
iShares offers a similar strategy with its gold offerings. The iShares Gold Trust (IAU) commands a 0.25% fee—reasonable but not competitive. The iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) emerges as the winner in the ETF cost battle, charging just 0.09%. While its $6 billion asset base trails larger competitors, it provides more than sufficient liquidity and trading efficiency. IAUM’s modest share price enhances accessibility for retail investors seeking gold exposure without premium fees.
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL)
For investors prioritizing sustainability, the abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) offers a differentiated approach. At 0.17%, its expense ratio sits between GLDM and IAUM, but the real advantage lies in its commitment to responsible sourcing. All post-2012 gold adheres to London Bullion Market Association standards, ensuring environmental compliance and elimination of unethical financing. If ESG principles guide your investment decisions, SGOL merits consideration despite modestly higher costs.
Making Your Selection
The reality of physical gold ETFs is their fundamental similarity—all hold genuine bullion. Your decision should hinge on cost efficiency. For most investors, IAUM’s ultra-low 0.09% expense ratio represents the best value, followed closely by GLDM’s 0.10% structure. Those with ESG convictions might justify SGOL’s additional basis points for responsible gold sourcing.
Gold’s share price movements in 2025 underscore its value as a long-term portfolio component. By selecting low-cost ETF vehicles, you ensure more capital compounds on your behalf rather than enriching fund managers through excessive fees.