#比特币流动性 The existing financial system is undergoing a historic transformation. This is not just an internet meme, but a clear policy signal — the United States is brewing to reconstruct the entire financial infrastructure using cryptographic technology.
On the surface, it’s "support for encryption," but the implications are deeper. Core aspects of traditional finance such as payments, clearing, settlement, and asset registration will shift from intermediary-driven to on-chain driven. Imagine a future where international transfers no longer need to wait for SWIFT messages, but are confirmed on the blockchain in seconds — this is what’s about to happen.
This is not just talk. Stablecoins are already handling a large volume of cross-border settlements globally, and the scale is expanding. The enthusiasm for RWA (Real-World Asset on-chain) is also not unfounded — government bonds, corporate bonds, and fund shares are gradually being tokenized. On the regulatory front, relevant legal frameworks are also becoming clearer. Once the rules are finalized, on-chain finance will surpass traditional systems in efficiency, transparency, and global accessibility.
Why is this time particularly different? Because the US faces real difficulties: high debt burdens, aging infrastructure, and inefficient cross-border settlements. Rebuilding the entire system involves astronomical costs, but going on-chain is one of the few solutions that can simultaneously address efficiency, cost, and international competitiveness. From this perspective, it’s not just a policy tilt but a strategic choice.
If this transformation truly begins, the beneficiaries won’t be limited to a single currency but will include the long-term structural opportunities of the entire on-chain financial ecosystem. From payments to asset management, from domestic to cross-border, everything is being redefined.
What’s your view — is this just an official routine statement, or is the financial system truly entering a new era?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-c38fd030
· 2h ago
hay
Reply0
VitaliksTwin
· 8h ago
Well... to put it simply, the United States is playing a very big game. I think this time is truly different.
The SWIFT system definitely needs to be replaced; its efficiency is terrible.
Alright, I’m optimistic about the RWA sector; it’s really starting to move.
By the way, has the scale of stablecoins become so large? It’s a bit unexpected.
I was somewhat reserved about the policy framework being clear before, hoping it wouldn’t reverse again.
This logic actually holds up; the cost pressure is right there.
For the entire ecosystem to take off, it’s not just about trading coins, I agree with that.
Until regulations are finalized, it’s all just talk; let’s not be too optimistic.
But if it really gets started, the scale will be completely different, that’s something we have to admit.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 8h ago
Brothers are right, but I just want to ask—when that day really comes and the US implements it, will the coins we hold still be worth anything?
---
It sounds good on paper, but the question is, will SWIFT really sit idly by? I've seen this script many times before.
---
Stablecoins can indeed handle volume now, but to say they can surpass traditional systems? That's still a long way off.
---
To be honest, if the US pulls this off, it might be even more impactful than a halving.
---
RWA on-chain sounds appealing, but can domestic regulations loosen up on compliance? That's the real issue.
---
Basically, it's still a matter of利益博弈 (interest game), no need to overcomplicate it.
---
Transfers are indeed faster, but that's based on sacrificing some countries' voice. Do you believe that central banks around the world will team up to resist?
---
Let's wait until the rules are really finalized. For now, it's all just futures market speculation.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 8h ago
I quite agree with this logic, but to be honest, it still depends on whether the US can truly delegate authority to the chain...
View OriginalReply0
EagleEye
· 8h ago
Christmas Bull Run! 🐂
Reply0
EagleEye
· 8h ago
Christmas to the Moon! 🌕
Reply0
EagleEye
· 8h ago
Merry Christmas ⛄
Reply0
4am_degen
· 8h ago
The game the US is playing this time is indeed a big one; it's not as simple as it seems on the surface.
#比特币流动性 The existing financial system is undergoing a historic transformation. This is not just an internet meme, but a clear policy signal — the United States is brewing to reconstruct the entire financial infrastructure using cryptographic technology.
On the surface, it’s "support for encryption," but the implications are deeper. Core aspects of traditional finance such as payments, clearing, settlement, and asset registration will shift from intermediary-driven to on-chain driven. Imagine a future where international transfers no longer need to wait for SWIFT messages, but are confirmed on the blockchain in seconds — this is what’s about to happen.
This is not just talk. Stablecoins are already handling a large volume of cross-border settlements globally, and the scale is expanding. The enthusiasm for RWA (Real-World Asset on-chain) is also not unfounded — government bonds, corporate bonds, and fund shares are gradually being tokenized. On the regulatory front, relevant legal frameworks are also becoming clearer. Once the rules are finalized, on-chain finance will surpass traditional systems in efficiency, transparency, and global accessibility.
Why is this time particularly different? Because the US faces real difficulties: high debt burdens, aging infrastructure, and inefficient cross-border settlements. Rebuilding the entire system involves astronomical costs, but going on-chain is one of the few solutions that can simultaneously address efficiency, cost, and international competitiveness. From this perspective, it’s not just a policy tilt but a strategic choice.
If this transformation truly begins, the beneficiaries won’t be limited to a single currency but will include the long-term structural opportunities of the entire on-chain financial ecosystem. From payments to asset management, from domestic to cross-border, everything is being redefined.
What’s your view — is this just an official routine statement, or is the financial system truly entering a new era?