I've been tracking the recent activities of AIA's main holding addresses, and it's quite interesting these days. The address first increased its Liquidity allocation, and then quickly dispersed and transferred to several other addresses. Is this operation a planned dump or a Whipsaw?
From an on-chain performance perspective, if it were a dump, we should see a significant accumulation from the opposing side, but currently, this characteristic has not been captured. Instead, it seems more like a T order operation—smashing orders at high points to break the psychological defense of retail investors, collecting the chips from panic sellers, and then using bots to push the price up before distributing in batches. This rhythm is very obvious.
The decentralized transfer of addresses can also be explained—it may be to avoid single point risks or to lay the groundwork for subsequent operations. Continue to observe the subsequent transfers and market performance of this address, and the clues should become apparent soon.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationAlert
· 4h ago
This move is too familiar, it's clearly day trading to play people for suckers.
Dumping to collect positions and then the Bots pump, a classic routine.
The trick of transferring to different Addresses, in plain terms, is just to avoid being monitored.
Waiting to see how it goes later, feels like a change is coming.
If this wave can't escape, the retail investors will again be the dumb buyers.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 7h ago
On-chain traces are like records of antique circulation, and this decentralized transfer method... indeed resembles the preparation for some kind of "exhibition." Pouring orders to accumulate funds and then pushing prices higher, the sense of rhythm is quite meticulous.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirector
· 7h ago
I have seen this T-hand technique many times, just afraid that retail investors will panic and follow the sell-off, resulting in them losing their pants.
Wait, is that address still active? We need to keep an eye on it.
It's both a whipsaw and a dump, anyway, they're just playing us for suckers.
The psychological defense line is meant to be broken.
If this wave is really about avoiding risks, then there will definitely be more actions later, just waiting to watch the show.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 7h ago
It's the same old trick again, smashing orders to Whipsaw, Bots pushing higher, retail investors are just destined to be played for suckers.
Wait to see the follow-up actions, sure enough, clues will emerge.
The rhythm this time is indeed obvious, but I am more optimistic about the transfer logic of the holders in the future.
How is it this again? It feels like the T order operation is too obvious.
It looks a bit strange on-chain, can the theory of decentralized transfer to avoid risk be trusted?
Whether it's dumping or Whipsaw, retail investors following the trend are the most at a loss.
This rhythm is interesting, keep an eye on it.
The operational tricks of the holder's Address are too deep, small retail investors simply can't keep up with the rhythm.
Watching the decentralized transfer, on the contrary, I became more vigilant.
Smashing orders to collect funds, Bots pumping, this script is performed quite smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degen
· 7h ago
Uh… it's the old trick of whipsaw again, retail investors should wake up
I've seen too many of these decentralized transfers on-chain, it's not about avoiding risks, it's just laying the groundwork for a big dumping
T-order operation? Ha, just wait to be played for suckers, everyone
With such obvious address actions still analyzing, it’s better to just look at the price
This rhythm… is indeed very obvious, it’s clearly the rhythm of dumping
I bet five bucks, it will definitely dump within three days
I've been tracking the recent activities of AIA's main holding addresses, and it's quite interesting these days. The address first increased its Liquidity allocation, and then quickly dispersed and transferred to several other addresses. Is this operation a planned dump or a Whipsaw?
From an on-chain performance perspective, if it were a dump, we should see a significant accumulation from the opposing side, but currently, this characteristic has not been captured. Instead, it seems more like a T order operation—smashing orders at high points to break the psychological defense of retail investors, collecting the chips from panic sellers, and then using bots to push the price up before distributing in batches. This rhythm is very obvious.
The decentralized transfer of addresses can also be explained—it may be to avoid single point risks or to lay the groundwork for subsequent operations. Continue to observe the subsequent transfers and market performance of this address, and the clues should become apparent soon.