Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Whale preemptively positioned: 1.68 million coins accumulated before a governance vote of a certain mainstream token, with unrealized gains of 1.37 million USD in a week.
[Coin World] An interesting on-chain story. A large wallet quietly began accumulating before the governance proposal voting. From mid-December to the end of the month, over 1.68 million UNI tokens were proposed from a large trading platform, with a total value of 8.75 million dollars, and an average cost of only 5.2 dollars per token.
The timing is crucial - the governance proposal was officially submitted for voting on December 18, and it was finally approved on December 22. In just these few days, UNI rose to a high of $6.5. This address now has an unrealized profit of $1.37 million.
From an average price of $5.2 to a peak of $6.5, the increase exceeds 25%. What seems like a coincidental timing arrangement is actually a preemptive judgment of the impact of governance events. This is the operation at the whale level – accumulating chips before major events, waiting for the right moment.
It's the same old story, whales are always one step ahead of retail investors. We can only eat the leftovers.
This move by UNI is truly brilliant. They started laying the groundwork when it was just over $5, waiting for the governance trend. Now, floating profits are at 137 million... People who can make this much money really live differently.
Governance proposals should be decentralized, but it’s still dominated by big players, and I’m speechless.
A 25% increase might not seem like much, but considering the scale, with $8.88 million in principal leveraged, those who understand will understand.
It's still insider information, after all. Retail investors can only eat the dust.
Damn, the timing is too precise. Submitted on the 18th and approved on the 22nd. The whale must have been lurking already.
Accumulating coins on the eve of the governance vote—doesn't that clearly indicate they knew it would rise? By the way, is this compliant?
The cost at 5.2 is hilarious. I was chasing higher when it was already over 6. This gap...
Wait, is there tracking for this address? Next time, I should follow and copy the moves.
Another "coincidence." How many "coincidences" in the crypto world are actually insider info.
The information gap is really outrageous. While we're still looking at charts and candlesticks, they've already laid the groundwork before governance voting.
How familiar you must be with this ecosystem to execute this UNI move so precisely... But then again, this insider vibe is indeed strong.
This is the on-chain game, buddy. It's always institutions and retail investors playing two different sets.
They started accumulating a week before the governance vote, this information gap can be played forever.
From 5.2 to 6.5, is it really that simple? Why do I feel like there's such a strong insider smell?
Retail investors can't react at all; they've already eaten their fill.
Is this called "waiting for the wind to come?" It looks more like creating the wind themselves.
---
It's the same old story, hoarding before governance, taking profits at will, and we retail investors are always in the position of dumb buyers, right?
---
1.68 million UNI earned 1.37 million in a week, what a huge information gap, mere mortals can't comprehend.
---
Haha, good one, proposal on December 18, passed on the 22, such precise timing, coincidence? I don't believe you.
---
Buying at 5.2 and selling at 6.5, a 25% rise is just basic operation for whales, while we are still discussing this, they've already exited.
---
To be honest, I just want to know which institution or organization is behind this address, their information acquisition ability is incredible.
---
The water in governance voting is a bit deep, it feels like there’s always someone mysteriously laying out plans before major proposals, am I overthinking?