Many of the negative takes on lightweight perpetual DEX products actually come from a specific crowd. Consider the pattern: folks who criticize don't typically have hands-on experience running actual perp positions. Instead, they're grinding out content around prediction markets, often riding on badges and clout tied to those platforms. The criticism rings hollow when it's amplified by people who haven't actually tested the mechanics—no real skin in the game, just noise in the feed. When you separate the signal from the source, the picture becomes much clearer.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
blockBoyvip
· 9m ago
There's nothing wrong with what you said. A bunch of keyboard warriors who have never actually played perpetual contracts come out to criticize, it's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiacvip
· 12-22 15:58
There are mostly those who talk the talk but how many have actually put it into practice? Relying solely on riding the wave to express opinions, it's no wonder they get criticized.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictimvip
· 12-22 15:57
Oh no, it's this trap of rhetoric again. It's really annoying when people start talking without having used it... But to be fair, some criticisms do have a point.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFanvip
· 12-22 15:30
Critics who talk about things on paper are really boring; they start making up stories without having played themselves.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)