#以太坊行情技术解读 Hong Kong Island Virtual Asset Robbery Cases Occur Frequently: Last Night's Panic Moments in Mong Kok and Security Dilemmas
Last night at 8 pm, the core business district of Mong Kok, Hong Kong, once again sounded police sirens. Inside the President Commercial Building on Nathan Road, a cryptocurrency exchange shop was forcibly robbed by armed thieves. At the time, the store was about to close when 2-3 masked men suddenly forced their way in and directly demanded the store owner, a 46-year-old, to open the door. An intense struggle ensued—blood splattered from the owner’s fingers, and his wife, terrified, called the police. The entire incident lasted less than 5 minutes. The robbers, seeing the situation was turning against them, fled in a panic, but the virtual assets worth tens of millions of Hong Kong dollars inside the store remained completely intact.
**Details of the Scene Revealed**
Based on surveillance footage and witness descriptions, this case hints at an "inspection-based" approach to committing the crime. Nearby merchants recall that the robbers did not shout phrases like “rob the money,” but instead directly pushed people toward the counter. The store’s glass door is equipped with dual biometric locks, suggesting the suspects likely disguised themselves as ordinary customers and followed others inside when they entered.
What is most chilling is that during the investigation, a hydraulic cutter and a signal jammer were found in a backpack left at the scene—this combination of tools clearly targets security systems of cryptocurrency shops. Police arrived within 3 minutes through the silent alarm system inside the store, preventing a potentially larger loss. The owner later revealed that the store has long maintained multiple cold wallets across different chains, with a total value fluctuating between HKD 8 million and HKD 15 million.
**Virtual Asset Security Crisis on Hong Kong Island**
If this were an isolated incident, it might be manageable, but the problem is that it is not an isolated case. According to journalists, Hong Kong has experienced three consecutive robberies targeting virtual asset shops, with individual losses reaching as high as HKD 23 million. This reflects the fragility of the entire industry’s defensive system.
With Hong Kong issuing cryptocurrency licenses, the number of licensed exchanges across the city has exceeded 40, and more than 200 exchange shops are operating on the streets. However, the latest report from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority reveals sobering data: only 35% of these shops have installed burglar-proof glass, and fewer than 20% are equipped with satellite alarm systems. In other words, most virtual asset businesses still have relatively primitive security measures.
Some netizens have complained on social media: “I thought hardware wallets and cold wallets could make assets safer, but the thieves even want the password notebooks.” While this remark is somewhat helpless, it reflects a real dilemma—virtual assets can be stored digitally, but once offline transactions and cash exchanges are involved, physical risks are everywhere.
**Challenges and Opportunities for the Industry**
From a certain perspective, these incidents are a painful consequence of the rapid expansion of the virtual asset market. As more people start holding cryptocurrencies like $BTC and $ETH , the demand for offline exchanges and trading will inevitably increase. However, regulatory frameworks, security standards, and industry training have not yet fully caught up.
Authorities are investigating cross-border money laundering channels and are also reviewing whether insiders might have leaked information about certain shops that recently had large inflows. This highlights a critical issue: not only must we guard against external thieves, but internal threats as well.
**Urgent Need to Upgrade Security Measures**
For individuals holding virtual assets and businesses operating in this sector, as the year-end approaches, security upgrades have become an essential course. In addition to strengthening hardware protections (burglar-proof glass, multi-factor biometric authentication, silent alarms), internal management procedures should also be improved—such as shift rotations, multi-person verification, and irregularly changing storage locations.
The frequent robberies on Hong Kong Island serve as a warning to the entire industry and regulators: businesses need to enhance security levels, authorities should establish clearer safety standards, and law enforcement must intensify crackdowns. Only by forming a comprehensive three-pronged defense system can virtual assets enjoy both the convenience of digital storage and the security of physical protection.
This is not alarmism, but a rational reminder based on current realities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocDetective
· 21h ago
It seems that someone in Hong Kong Island is really willing to take risks, even daring to steal cold wallets?
The insider problem is probably the main issue. Despite such comprehensive surveillance, they still managed to be spotted.
Only 20% of the 200 exchange shops have alarm systems, this data is quite shocking.
The virtual asset market is booming but has become a target, how ironic.
This hydraulic shear with a shield clearly belongs to a professional team, organized and premeditated.
Less than 35% of anti-riot glass? That's the same in the Hong Kong Island financial center.
Cold wallets are really useless in offline transactions; you still need a defense system.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 21h ago
Hong Kong now has even crypto shops being robbed. Can this business still be done, bro?
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 21h ago
lol this is peak governance failure right here... weak physical security revealing the systemic vulnerabilities of centralized exchange infrastructure. the real exploit isn't the heist, it's that 65% of shops still running without basic defenses. amateur hour meets protocol economics. bet there's an internal vector nobody's even discussing yet
Reply0
GasFeeLady
· 22h ago
ngl this is why i always say cold storage ain't cold enough if someone's got bolt cutters and knows ur address lol
#以太坊行情技术解读 Hong Kong Island Virtual Asset Robbery Cases Occur Frequently: Last Night's Panic Moments in Mong Kok and Security Dilemmas
Last night at 8 pm, the core business district of Mong Kok, Hong Kong, once again sounded police sirens. Inside the President Commercial Building on Nathan Road, a cryptocurrency exchange shop was forcibly robbed by armed thieves. At the time, the store was about to close when 2-3 masked men suddenly forced their way in and directly demanded the store owner, a 46-year-old, to open the door. An intense struggle ensued—blood splattered from the owner’s fingers, and his wife, terrified, called the police. The entire incident lasted less than 5 minutes. The robbers, seeing the situation was turning against them, fled in a panic, but the virtual assets worth tens of millions of Hong Kong dollars inside the store remained completely intact.
**Details of the Scene Revealed**
Based on surveillance footage and witness descriptions, this case hints at an "inspection-based" approach to committing the crime. Nearby merchants recall that the robbers did not shout phrases like “rob the money,” but instead directly pushed people toward the counter. The store’s glass door is equipped with dual biometric locks, suggesting the suspects likely disguised themselves as ordinary customers and followed others inside when they entered.
What is most chilling is that during the investigation, a hydraulic cutter and a signal jammer were found in a backpack left at the scene—this combination of tools clearly targets security systems of cryptocurrency shops. Police arrived within 3 minutes through the silent alarm system inside the store, preventing a potentially larger loss. The owner later revealed that the store has long maintained multiple cold wallets across different chains, with a total value fluctuating between HKD 8 million and HKD 15 million.
**Virtual Asset Security Crisis on Hong Kong Island**
If this were an isolated incident, it might be manageable, but the problem is that it is not an isolated case. According to journalists, Hong Kong has experienced three consecutive robberies targeting virtual asset shops, with individual losses reaching as high as HKD 23 million. This reflects the fragility of the entire industry’s defensive system.
With Hong Kong issuing cryptocurrency licenses, the number of licensed exchanges across the city has exceeded 40, and more than 200 exchange shops are operating on the streets. However, the latest report from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority reveals sobering data: only 35% of these shops have installed burglar-proof glass, and fewer than 20% are equipped with satellite alarm systems. In other words, most virtual asset businesses still have relatively primitive security measures.
Some netizens have complained on social media: “I thought hardware wallets and cold wallets could make assets safer, but the thieves even want the password notebooks.” While this remark is somewhat helpless, it reflects a real dilemma—virtual assets can be stored digitally, but once offline transactions and cash exchanges are involved, physical risks are everywhere.
**Challenges and Opportunities for the Industry**
From a certain perspective, these incidents are a painful consequence of the rapid expansion of the virtual asset market. As more people start holding cryptocurrencies like $BTC and $ETH , the demand for offline exchanges and trading will inevitably increase. However, regulatory frameworks, security standards, and industry training have not yet fully caught up.
Authorities are investigating cross-border money laundering channels and are also reviewing whether insiders might have leaked information about certain shops that recently had large inflows. This highlights a critical issue: not only must we guard against external thieves, but internal threats as well.
**Urgent Need to Upgrade Security Measures**
For individuals holding virtual assets and businesses operating in this sector, as the year-end approaches, security upgrades have become an essential course. In addition to strengthening hardware protections (burglar-proof glass, multi-factor biometric authentication, silent alarms), internal management procedures should also be improved—such as shift rotations, multi-person verification, and irregularly changing storage locations.
The frequent robberies on Hong Kong Island serve as a warning to the entire industry and regulators: businesses need to enhance security levels, authorities should establish clearer safety standards, and law enforcement must intensify crackdowns. Only by forming a comprehensive three-pronged defense system can virtual assets enjoy both the convenience of digital storage and the security of physical protection.
This is not alarmism, but a rational reminder based on current realities.