Identity verification and data management have become pain points of the modern Internet. Almost every application wants to store or verify your personal information, bringing with it the risks of security vulnerabilities and privacy leaks.



This is where MPC multi-party computation comes into play. Instead of consolidating sensitive data on a single server (which is a hacker's target), it's better to change the approach — break the data into multiple encrypted fragments and distribute them across different nodes. Even if a node is attacked, the attacker can only access useless fragments. Complete information will never be exposed at any single location. This is the core logic of decentralized identity management.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHerovip
· 32m ago
It has been proven that the MPC solution indeed addresses the attack vectors of centralized storage, but the key question is—how many nodes constitute the security threshold? Three? Five? There are no hard metric data in the protocol architecture.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChainvip
· 10h ago
MPC really is awesome. Finally, someone has explained data fragmentation clearly. I just want to ask, can this really prevent those 0day vulnerabilities? Decentralized identity management has been hyped for so long, but how many actually have practical implementations? It was about time to do this; centralized storage is basically a ticking time bomb. By the way, if this really becomes widespread, companies that rely on selling user data will have a hard time.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTalkervip
· 10h ago
actually, if we break this down through the lens of information theory... mpc's basically turning your data into that one scene from mr. robot where they shred everything into confetti, except it actually *works* mathematically lol. the paradigm shift here is empirically proven—distributed fragments beat centralized honeypots every damn time. ngl tho, adoption's still the bottleneck.
Reply0
ApyWhisperervip
· 10h ago
Oh my, finally someone is seriously discussing MPC, most projects are just blowing smoke --- Decentralized storage is truly awesome, the centralized approach should have died long ago --- Sounds good, but how many can actually achieve this in reality? --- The path of decentralized identity still needs to be taken, better than being casually sold data by big internet companies --- Single point failure is indeed disgusting, multi-party computation is a viable approach --- Fragmented storage sounds safer, but I wonder how it performs in practice --- The analogy of hackers as targets is spot on, so the direction of Web3 is still correct
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 10h ago
This MPC logic is truly excellent, much more reassuring than centralized exchanges piling your data together. However, there aren't enough projects actually utilizing it yet.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntressvip
· 10h ago
I've already mentioned this MPC logic before. Decentralized storage is truly advantageous, but currently most projects are still lazily using the centralized approach.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeePhobiavip
· 10h ago
Uh... The MPC theory sounds good, but how will it be implemented in practice? It still depends on how major exchanges and wallets actually deploy it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)