We once demonstrated a pipeline capable of producing blocks at a million TPS. But here's the thing—if the broader network infrastructure can't match that pace, the chain won't actually achieve it. That's the real constraint. Building a truly high-throughput, high-performance blockchain isn't just about maximizing one metric. You need coordination across multiple layers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityOracle
· 4h ago
Haha, is it the same old spiel? A million TPS sounds great, but if the infrastructure can't keep up, it's just a paper tiger.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 12-13 01:53
Surface data alone is useless; the key is that the underlying technology must keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ContractBugHunter
· 12-12 14:50
1 million TPS sounds awesome, but if the underlying layer can't keep up, it's all for nothing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 12-12 14:41
What’s the use of blowing up to a million TPS? If the underlying layer can't keep up, it's all talk and no action.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 12-12 14:30
That's correct, a single-point breakthrough is meaningless; the overall coordination of the ecosystem is the true way.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 12-12 14:26
Surface data looks good, but once it goes live on the mainnet, the truth will be revealed. The infrastructure can't keep up, so it's all for nothing.
We once demonstrated a pipeline capable of producing blocks at a million TPS. But here's the thing—if the broader network infrastructure can't match that pace, the chain won't actually achieve it. That's the real constraint. Building a truly high-throughput, high-performance blockchain isn't just about maximizing one metric. You need coordination across multiple layers.