2025-12-11 16:38:01

Friends observing GOAT Rollup recently might be hesitant about whether to participate. Now is a good time to get involved.

GOAT Network has launched its second round of ambassador recruitment. The selection criteria are quite straightforward — it doesn't matter how you package yourself, only whether you are a genuine user on the chain. The core requirement is to prove that you are actually using this chain, not just parasitizing.

To put it simply, here are some key points: The activity assessment will look at your monthly interaction frequency and quality on the chain; just flooding the system won't pass. If you are already using various on-chain protocols, participating in DeFi or NFT transactions, then this plan is basically tailored for you. The threshold isn't high, but you must be a genuine user.

GOAT2.23%

GOATED-2.58%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

IronHeadMiner

· 20h ago

Haha, finally a project that isn't just here to cut leeks. I really appreciate the focus on real users. This time, it really depends on the actual implementation, not just empty promises. There's some substance.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 20h ago

No, I've heard this set of words from real users too many times. In the end, it all comes down to who clicks more frequently... Wait, this time really not clicking artificially? Then I need to reconsider. Nah, I think it's still about luck. Anyway, I've interacted with everything I need to. Whether I'm an ambassador or not doesn't matter. Really? The threshold isn't high, but you need genuine users. That logic is a bit far-fetched. Speaking of which, those with high activity are all just trying to exploit the system. How do they tell the difference... But it really hits the mark. Compared to those superficial requirements, it's much more straightforward.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 20h ago

Speaking of the real user assessment logic... it sounds good, but it depends on how well the backend permission control is implemented. In my opinion, the most common vulnerability in this type of assessment system is the integer overflow issue in activity count. When that happens, fake accounts could bypass the detection, isn't that ironic?

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler