Everyone talks about what Agents *could* do. But here's the thing — none of that matters if we can't measure what they *actually* deliver in production.
That's where evaluation frameworks come in. No solid benchmarks? You're basically flying blind.
Just came across the MAP paper and honestly, it's a reality check the entire Agent community needed. If you're building in this space, this one's non-negotiable reading material.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrownies
· 12-13 03:40
Being in blind flying mode is really uncomfortable; the paper on MAP is a must-read.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustler
· 12-12 19:46
Blind flying is really amazing; I need to check out the MAP paper.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 12-11 10:53
A striking hit to the point, and MAP really hit the sore
View OriginalReply0
DarkPoolWatcher
· 12-11 10:53
The Blind Flight state definitely needs to be rectified, and that paper on MAP really hits hard.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 12-11 10:52
The phrase "flying blind" is spot on. Right now, there are indeed a bunch of people hyping up what Agent can do, but in reality, they haven't even figured out how to measure it properly.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidator
· 12-11 10:52
What are you testing? Just a bunch of surface-level data.
Everyone talks about what Agents *could* do. But here's the thing — none of that matters if we can't measure what they *actually* deliver in production.
That's where evaluation frameworks come in. No solid benchmarks? You're basically flying blind.
Just came across the MAP paper and honestly, it's a reality check the entire Agent community needed. If you're building in this space, this one's non-negotiable reading material.