2025-12-11 08:33:37

Security-first design? That's what catches my attention about beyond tech. In crypto, where one vulnerability can drain millions overnight, their approach feels refreshing.

Their core infrastructure — they call it The Forge — is built differently from the ground up. The V1 release already shows some solid engineering choices that address common attack vectors most projects overlook.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NewDAOdreamer

· 9h ago

Honestly, I quite appreciate the approach of building the architecture from scratch. Unlike some projects that just fudge things. To be honest, not many projects take security seriously; most only think about patching holes later. The name "The Forge" sounds pretty fierce; hopefully it won't crash and burn. Building from zero sounds good, but the key is to truly withstand market tests. This wave of logic is clear, and prioritizing safety is indeed the right path. But many projects boast the same in their early stages. Honestly, who still believes in the idea that "designing from zero is safer"... but at least the attitude is decent.

View OriginalReply0

GasGoblin

· 22h ago

Honestly, I'm finally seeing projects that genuinely take security seriously, not just for marketing hype. I've looked into The Forge's architecture design, and it's definitely not superficial. Traditional projects are full of loopholes and boast loudly, while these folks work quietly. They have something real.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTrader

· 12-13 07:29

Prioritizing safety is truly the right approach; too many projects have been completely hacked. The beyond tech approach is reliable.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 12-11 09:01

Finally, a team that takes security seriously, not just lip service. The Forge sounds reliable; starting from scratch is a deliberate process, only moving forward once everything is well thought out. There are indeed many pitfalls; a single vulnerability can drain your dreams... This time, I finally see some genuine effort.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 12-11 08:56

Bro, this time I finally see a project taking security seriously, not just talking about it. The Forge is built from scratch, I like this approach much more than just tweaking existing code. Really? Can V1 block common attack vectors? It depends on real-world testing; a pretty paper design can fool anyone. Finally, no more worrying every day about waking up to find your money gone... Maybe.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 12-11 08:55

Really, I totally agree with the safety-first approach. Too many projects focus only on speed and ignore risks. Forge is built from scratch? That's the right way, not some cobbled-together stuff. Finally, I see a team taking common vulnerabilities seriously. What about others? They're just gambling with luck.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLover

· 12-11 08:54

Security-first is indeed a rare approach; most projects only focus on features, and one vulnerability can end everything. Starting The Forge from scratch? I have to keep an eye on that. Unlike some projects that cobble things together. Have they really addressed common attack vectors? Don’t tell me it’s just theoretical. Finally seeing a team that takes security seriously. Not everyone can afford to lose millions overnight.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 12-11 08:49

Laughing out loud, finally there's a project that doesn't first think about how to cut leeks, but instead considers security vulnerabilities... This move is truly rare. Starting Forge from scratch? I believe, but I'm just afraid it will end up as a "scrap heap." Those who take attack vectors seriously show that the founders haven't been worn down by the market, which is quite rare. Speaking of genuinely risk-averse projects, they often lack popularity, while those with flashy whitepapers attract a lot of followers. But I remain optimistic; the principle of safety first must be consistently upheld to be meaningful.

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 12-11 08:35

Safety first, this set is indeed scarce in this circle. The Forge starting from zero? Alright, I acknowledge this stance, but let's see what V2 has to say. Most common vulnerabilities have been patched... wait, what about the uncommon ones? Finally, someone is taking security seriously, unlike some projects that treat users' money like a casino.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
17.52K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
669.79K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
64.84K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
16.06K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
545.09K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
FRBGFireBerg
MC:$3.72KHolders:2
0.00%
2
FartCoinFartCoin
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
3
MoonShotCatMoonShotCat
MC:$0.1Holders:1
0.00%
4
NeiroNeiro
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
5
BasedChadBasedChad
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap