2025-12-11 08:30:38

In essence, we need to create a chief commander Agent.

Imagine agents A, B, C, D, and E working on different branches, and there's a role that oversees the entire picture from a higher dimension: Who is currently working? Who should be prioritized for activation? Who needs to finish before the next can proceed? Are the resources sufficient?

This meta-level perspective is the real dimensionality reduction.

This is the principle behind it.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainMemeDealer

· 17h ago

Alright, this idea is brilliant—it's very much the essence of an orchestrator. Coordination among multiple agents definitely requires a central brain to oversee everything; otherwise, they might run off in different directions and cause chaos. Resource allocation, priorities, and dependencies—if no one manages these, it could lead to disaster.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 12-12 13:24

Bro, this is a coordination issue; we need a coordinator or everything will be a mess. It's really like multi-chain governance—without a terminal node, everything is pointless. I need to think about how to implement this idea within the current framework.

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 12-11 22:10

This coordination layer is indeed easy to talk about but very difficult to implement. The orchestrator is truly the key to the entire system; once the logic gets mixed up, resources are wasted. However, this multi-Agent architecture is still somewhat cumbersome; it feels much more complex to develop than directly deploying large models. It's really just about having an intelligent task scheduler. Currently, most projects are growing wildly without a clear plan in this regard. The meta-level is indeed crucial, but in reality, few can truly understand and master it. The overall commander Agent needs to learn to make trade-offs; otherwise, it becomes a bottleneck. This approach is correct, but the implementation difficulty increases exponentially.

View OriginalReply0

EntryPositionAnalyst

· 12-11 08:32

The overall commander Agent is the orchestrator, right? This thing really needs to be there, or else A to E would just be a bunch of scattered soldiers. It's essentially the idea of a DAG—understanding who depends on whom is crucial. That's the real test of system design.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops

· 12-11 08:32

Bro, this architecture idea is indeed brilliant. The most critical part is the orchestrator layer, or else each agent would just do their own thing. Wait, isn't this just the logic of MPC multi-signature? It should have been done this way a long time ago. If the coordination layer is poorly implemented, the entire system could become fragmented, really. How to implement this? Is there an open-source solution, or do we have to develop it ourselves?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
23.58K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
691.87K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
69.05K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
19.68K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
511.6K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
WoLFWolf Coin
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.09%
2
14332231433223
MC:$3.63KHolders:2
0.12%
3
SoSoSoSo
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.00%
4
GugeAICNGugeAI.cn
MC:$3.59KHolders:1
0.00%
5
EOSEOS
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.08%

Sitemap