Alturax's transparent philosophy is commendable, but users should place risk assessment on the same level of importance when dealing with any yield-bearing protocols.

The market is never short of good visions, but what truly puts users at ease is a proactive response to risks.

@alturax has published audit information and publicly emphasized security, which is a necessary step for establishing foundational trust in a project.

Audits can demonstrate that the core code follows the expected logic and can reveal whether potential issues have been addressed. However, an audit does not equate to absolute security; it is only a part of risk management.

For users, it is even more important to continue monitoring contract update records, on-chain real operations, fund flows, and changes in strategic positions.

Moreover, the robustness of a yield protocol is closely tied to its overall economic model. Factors such as funding sources, investment strategies, and the distribution and locking of early supporters all determine whether the project can remain stable under pressure.

Alturax has mentioned its backing from capital support in public channels, which helps promote development. However, every participant should independently evaluate the token release rhythm and liquidity structure when making decisions.

Understanding risks, observing data, and making rational decisions are the true paths to ensuring long-term yield experiences.

This way of thinking makes users not only participants but also builders who can control their own pace. Transparency combined with prudence is far more valuable than simply expecting high returns.