2025-12-10 20:38:47

Volume transparency is my first filter. If I can't trace where the trading activity is actually coming from - whether it's organic retail, whale accumulation, or wash trading - I'm staying out. Too many projects pump numbers that vanish under basic on-chain scrutiny. Not worth the risk.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PortfolioAlert

· 6h ago

That's right, but very few people can actually do this.

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 12-11 02:34

Only when I can trace back to the authentic source of the transaction do I dare to participate. I respect that.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 12-10 21:08

The truth is, on-chain data can lie, but the signs of wash trading can't fool people.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 12-10 21:08

ngl, on-chain forensics is literally the only way to separate signal from noise rn. seen way too many projects collapse the second you pull the verifcation layer back lmao

Reply0

RunWhenCut

· 12-10 21:03

Numbers can lie, but the blockchain won't. That's what I focus on.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMinion

· 12-10 20:52

Now I understand that real liquidity must be considered; surface data can be deceptive. On-chain data is so easy to fake, I don't even know who is still playing this game. Agreed, there are too many fake volumes; only act after thorough tracking. Once scrutinized, the true nature is revealed. That's why I am very cautious. I generally avoid opaque assets; the risks are too high.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 12-10 20:50

Someone should have said this earlier: on-chain data is the truth, everything else is just performance.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 12-10 20:42

That's right, it's easy to see through manipulation, so it's really not interesting.

View OriginalReply0