Source: Btcpeers
Original Title: Japan Shifts Cryptocurrency Oversight From Payments Law to Securities Framework
Original Link: https://btcpeers.com/japan-shifts-cryptocurrency-oversight-from-payments-law-to-securities-framework/
Japan’s Financial Services Agency released a comprehensive report outlining plans to transfer cryptocurrency regulation from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. The Financial System Council’s Working Group concluded crypto assets now function primarily as investment targets rather than payment instruments. The proposed framework would apply securities market rules to digital asset trading, issuance, and disclosure requirements. The report states that crypto transactions conducted by users resemble securities transactions, requiring investor protection measures comparable to traditional financial products. This regulatory shift follows discussions about categorizing more than 100 major cryptocurrencies as investment products.
The FSA released the proposal amid parallel considerations for tax reform that would reduce crypto trading rates from 55 percent to a flat 20 percent. The new system would mirror capital gains treatment for stocks and allow investors to carry forward losses for up to three years. The plan uses criteria including issuer transparency, technical reliability, and user safety to determine which assets qualify for securities classification. The framework gives regulators stronger tools to address unregistered trading venues and includes explicit prohibitions on insider trading.
Direct Impact on Token Sales and Exchanges
The regulatory transition creates immediate consequences for initial exchange offerings and trading platforms operating in Japan. Under FIEA rules, exchanges managing token sales would face stricter presale disclosure requirements including identification of project teams and independent code audits. The working group emphasizes that IEOs resemble securities offerings because users purchase new assets or trade existing tokens. Exchanges must now provide documentation comparable to public securities offerings before listing new digital assets. Self-regulatory organizations would review token launches to ensure compliance with disclosure standards. The framework addresses market conduct that current payment-focused rules cannot adequately supervise.
Japan’s crypto market contains approximately 32 registered exchange providers serving more than 12 million account holders as of January 2025. Customer deposits exceed 5 trillion yen across these platforms. The FSA reports that 7.3 percent of domestic investors with prior experience hold crypto assets, exceeding participation rates for foreign exchange trading or corporate bonds. Regional developments show that countries are reassessing how existing payment laws govern investment activity, with structured regulatory approaches influencing broader cryptocurrency policies.
Regional Competition and Global Alignment
Japan’s reclassification reflects a broader international trend toward treating digital assets as investment products rather than payment mechanisms. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets framework and South Korea’s regulations already include insider trading prohibitions that Japanese law previously lacked. Moving crypto under FIEA positions Japan alongside jurisdictions that prioritize investor protection and market integrity over payment innovation. The change could strengthen Japan’s appeal for institutional investors seeking regulatory clarity in Asian markets. Traditional financial institutions gain defined pathways for entering crypto operations through partnerships with licensed service providers.
The FSA’s cautious stance on leveraged crypto derivatives suggests regulators remain concerned about certain products entering domestic markets. Officials described underlying assets for such derivatives as “not desirable.” The agency plans to restrict access to exchanges operating without approval and bring decentralized platforms under scrutiny when identifiable operators exist. This comprehensive oversight extends beyond current payment law provisions. International crypto businesses may view Japan’s framework as either an opportunity for compliant market entry or a barrier requiring substantial operational adjustments. The proposal timeline extends into 2026 as regulators refine standards for disclosure, custody, and consumer protection.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Japan Shifts Cryptocurrency Oversight From Payments Law to Securities Framework
Source: Btcpeers Original Title: Japan Shifts Cryptocurrency Oversight From Payments Law to Securities Framework Original Link: https://btcpeers.com/japan-shifts-cryptocurrency-oversight-from-payments-law-to-securities-framework/ Japan’s Financial Services Agency released a comprehensive report outlining plans to transfer cryptocurrency regulation from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. The Financial System Council’s Working Group concluded crypto assets now function primarily as investment targets rather than payment instruments. The proposed framework would apply securities market rules to digital asset trading, issuance, and disclosure requirements. The report states that crypto transactions conducted by users resemble securities transactions, requiring investor protection measures comparable to traditional financial products. This regulatory shift follows discussions about categorizing more than 100 major cryptocurrencies as investment products.
The FSA released the proposal amid parallel considerations for tax reform that would reduce crypto trading rates from 55 percent to a flat 20 percent. The new system would mirror capital gains treatment for stocks and allow investors to carry forward losses for up to three years. The plan uses criteria including issuer transparency, technical reliability, and user safety to determine which assets qualify for securities classification. The framework gives regulators stronger tools to address unregistered trading venues and includes explicit prohibitions on insider trading.
Direct Impact on Token Sales and Exchanges
The regulatory transition creates immediate consequences for initial exchange offerings and trading platforms operating in Japan. Under FIEA rules, exchanges managing token sales would face stricter presale disclosure requirements including identification of project teams and independent code audits. The working group emphasizes that IEOs resemble securities offerings because users purchase new assets or trade existing tokens. Exchanges must now provide documentation comparable to public securities offerings before listing new digital assets. Self-regulatory organizations would review token launches to ensure compliance with disclosure standards. The framework addresses market conduct that current payment-focused rules cannot adequately supervise.
Japan’s crypto market contains approximately 32 registered exchange providers serving more than 12 million account holders as of January 2025. Customer deposits exceed 5 trillion yen across these platforms. The FSA reports that 7.3 percent of domestic investors with prior experience hold crypto assets, exceeding participation rates for foreign exchange trading or corporate bonds. Regional developments show that countries are reassessing how existing payment laws govern investment activity, with structured regulatory approaches influencing broader cryptocurrency policies.
Regional Competition and Global Alignment
Japan’s reclassification reflects a broader international trend toward treating digital assets as investment products rather than payment mechanisms. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets framework and South Korea’s regulations already include insider trading prohibitions that Japanese law previously lacked. Moving crypto under FIEA positions Japan alongside jurisdictions that prioritize investor protection and market integrity over payment innovation. The change could strengthen Japan’s appeal for institutional investors seeking regulatory clarity in Asian markets. Traditional financial institutions gain defined pathways for entering crypto operations through partnerships with licensed service providers.
The FSA’s cautious stance on leveraged crypto derivatives suggests regulators remain concerned about certain products entering domestic markets. Officials described underlying assets for such derivatives as “not desirable.” The agency plans to restrict access to exchanges operating without approval and bring decentralized platforms under scrutiny when identifiable operators exist. This comprehensive oversight extends beyond current payment law provisions. International crypto businesses may view Japan’s framework as either an opportunity for compliant market entry or a barrier requiring substantial operational adjustments. The proposal timeline extends into 2026 as regulators refine standards for disclosure, custody, and consumer protection.